sealed enclosure question

Bigger and smaller boxes have trade-offs.

The smaller the box, the peakier the response in the upper bass/lower midbass region (which is what most people interpret as "tight" or "punchy"), higher mechanical power handling (less efficiency), worse low frequency extension (how low it plays), degraded transient response (sound quality), and overall more output. These are the effects of a "high Qtc" box.

The bigger the box, the flatter the frequency response, the less overall output, better transient response, better low frequency extension, and lower mechanical power handling. These are characteristics of a "low Qtc" box.

Now, "how far off" from recommended you can go really depends on where on the "Qtc" scale their recommended enclosure is, and how much box changes affect the "Qtc" of the system. It is not uncommon for manufacturers to recommend boxes on the smaller side ("higher Qtc" boxes) because it gives off the type of bass that the typical "bass head, street-beater" will like. Doesn't necessarily mean it's the "best" box, because what makes the sub sound "best" is all personal preference. Some people like the sound of low Qtc (bigger sized) boxes, some people like the sound of high Qtc (smaller sized) sealed enclosures.

So.....after rambling for a little bit and probably losing you along the way (I'm really bad at explaining stuff), the point I'm getting at is that there isn't any set amount of variation you can/can't have, and being "over" or "under" the recommended box size is really personal preference and dependent upon what type of characteristics their recommended box size has.

So, it really depends on what sub in particular we are talking about, aswell as your listening preferences and power requirements. However, I will say that slight variations in box size for sealed enclosures typically have less of an impact on performance than variations in box size for ported enclosures. So if you measure wrong, or don't have quite enough room or whatever....it isn't the end of the world and the sub won't self-implode because of it.

 
WOW, that was a lot of stuff u threw at me. I had my buddy NG design me a box, that will hopefully perform better than what the install guys built. the box that was built for me seemed waaaay too small. According to the fosgate box calculator its about 2.1 cu ft GROSS volume (not including speaker displacement nor the displacement of the seperator). The box NG drew up will have a NET volume of 2.55 cu ft after all displacements. As for the equipment I'm running, I have 2 fosgate Punch HE2 DVC 2212 each powered by their own fosgate power 800a2 amp (bbq grills). i know its amp overkill, but i plan on changing to SX...

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

chefboyrlee

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
chefboyrlee
Joined
Location
los angeles, ca
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
3
Views
1,146
Last reply date
Last reply from
chefboyrlee
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top