Resonant Engineering on eBay

im not saying its right or wrong. im just saying that adire does it now and then. and if RE wanted to, they could claim its a copyright infringment. its THEIR call weather to push for them to be removed or not.

i have SEEN 'bnib brahmas' get deleted off ebay when there were multiples of them from the same guy.

they can do it if they want to because the guy is using their trademark name. thats all im saying //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

if i had the $ to buy 10 RE RE 12's and re-sell them. i would have. but i didnt, and thats how life is.

 
im not saying its right or wrong. im just saying that adire does it now and then. and if RE wanted to, they could claim its a copyright infringment. its THEIR call weather to push for them to be removed or not.
i have SEEN 'bnib brahmas' get deleted off ebay when there were multiples of them from the same guy.

they can do it if they want to because the guy is using their trademark name. thats all im saying //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

if i had the $ to buy 10 RE RE 12's and re-sell them. i would have. but i didnt, and thats how life is.
So you are saying EVERY ebay auction could technically be shut down because every single one of them is using a trademark name //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

It would only be trademark infringement if 1) The items were not truly RE products, and 2) The trademarked name is being used intentionally to confuse the buyer and make them think they are buying a geniune RE product, when the item truly is not. Beyond that, you can use the manufacturer's name as often as you like to identify the product.

Sorry req, it's just not infringement to describe the product by using the manufacturer's name. Claiming to be an authorized dealer, when you are in fact not is a whole nother ball of wax though. But that doesn't appear to be the case here.

 
So you are saying EVERY ebay auction could technically be shut down because every single one of them is using a trademark name //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
It would only be trademark infringement if 1) The items were not truly RE products, and 2) The trademarked name is being used intentionally to confuse the buyer and make them think they are buying a geniune RE product, when the item truly is not. Beyond that, you can use the manufacturer's name as often as you like to identify the product.

Sorry req, it's just not infringement to describe the product by using the manufacturer's name. Claiming to be an authorized dealer, when you are in fact not is a whole nother ball of wax though. But that doesn't appear to be the case here.
then explain why adire has taken items off in the past. particularly a brahma mk2 that i saw way back when, and was deleted back in the day after a thread was started and steve kephardt said he would look into it - i dont remember the details. but how come they did that?

all im saying - is ive SEEN adire do it. why cant RE?

 
all im saying - is ive SEEN adire do it. why cant RE?
The guy could have been claiming to be an authorized dealer. Or claiming it was going to be covered by factory warranty? But just for using the manufacturer's name to describe a product they produced, you can not claim trademark infringement.

 
yeah but the purpose of having a group buy is to help those who maybe can't purchase items at the normal prices. Granted yes some people do what this person has, but I'm pretty sure group buys are not intended for people to pay less then the normal prices and turn right around and make a profit.
he can do whatever he wants though, just my 0.02 on the matter


the group buy was indented so help some people out. it was also intended to get some people to try out RE that might not have had the prices not been lowered. some people bought RE comps and resold them, just to get the 15% discount on everything else.

is taht a bad thing?, nope

neither is this. i know its not the same thing, so im not saying that

 
whats the big deal. RE did the group buy to sell products not because they love you all. They made their money off of them. They set their objectives and price and it was successful. If somebody wants to buy them from this person at his price so be it. Believe it or not RE will make and sell more speakers.

 
There is NO copyright infringment there at all. He's not masquerading non-RE products as RE products, nor his he claiming the brand is his own.

He is reselling products, there is absolutely NOTHING illegal about it. RE can't, and won't, do a **** thing about it. I doubt they really give a shit, honestly.

If his story is correct, he's just selling off stock. Either way, so long as they are legit RE products, there really isn't any grounds for complaining whatsoever.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

johnecon2001

5,000+ posts
SSA/ROE Super-Møderator
Thread starter
johnecon2001
Joined
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
53
Views
2,513
Last reply date
Last reply from
HeatSeeker
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top