Reasons to NOT get a Suzuki car.

I nailed a tree doing 70 in one of my Porsches back years ago....a curve came up and I accidently went straight...there was hardly any damage to the car...I clipped the same fender as that Suzuki...I busted a front reflector....dented the fender slightly...talk about well built //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif They don't build cars like they use to....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 
I drive a 2003 Suzuki Vitara all the time. I only drive it 'cause it's a standard and it's fun taking it to the lake and makin' fun of all the guys with the big trucks getting stuck, and I just maneuver my way around it all. It's a decent little vehicle.

 
You guys do understand the concept of crumple zones, right ? They're designed to crumple to absorb energy which would otherwise be passed onto the passengers thereby reducing the chances of suffering severe injuries in the event of a high-speed collision.
Crash both the car and the truck into a brick wall at 60 MPH and I guarantee that the driver in the car will be more likely to survive than the driver in the truck ...
^x2. I was going to mention this as well, but Jmac seems to have explained it better than I woulda. Still...suziki's **** regardless. For cars at least. I hear their motorcycles are pretty nice. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Umm, that fender ripping off like that had nothing to do with a crumple zone. It caught the bottom of my bumper and just ripped off like tin foil. I'm willing to bet they total that car out.

 
You guys do understand the concept of crumple zones, right ? They're designed to crumple to absorb energy which would otherwise be passed onto the passengers thereby reducing the chances of suffering severe injuries in the event of a high-speed collision.
Crash both the car and the truck into a brick wall at 60 MPH and I guarantee that the driver in the car will be more likely to survive than the driver in the truck ...
i agree with you. but as for the truck vs. car 60mph wall test..the truck will be safer. especially the older chevys //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

automotive collision repair profession ftw

 
Umm, that fender ripping off like that had nothing to do with a crumple zone. It caught the bottom of my bumper and just ripped off like tin foil. I'm willing to bet they total that car out.
Chevy > Suzuki .

lol, my first impression was "whoa! what is that car made out of"

 
exactly.......truck vs car.....truck wins.......unless the car is a 70's caddy........I agree w/ ya on suzuki cars, but their bikes are THE BEST;)
Agree to disagree //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/escape.gif.52b661afb17bde1db0e0c7da97e75b38.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif I dont know what it is but I have driven an 03 and an 07 gixxer and didnt care for either of em. Not sure why. I havent driven a busa though, so maybe thats where its at with suzuki.

 
Care to offer an explanation of why the truck driver will be safer ?
1. stronger metals in bigger vehicles to support larger loads of the engine, more cagro area, increased payload etc..

2. larger area to dispurse(sp?) collision impact force

some others..but i wanna eat.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

mr Tibbs

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
mr Tibbs
Joined
Location
Utah
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
26
Views
643
Last reply date
Last reply from
joetama
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top