RE components vs. Mach5 6.5

[oxsign 5,000+ posts]

I currently have a set of these (RE set) I never powered them so I dont really now what they sound like as of yet.......

http://www.reaudio.com/components.html

But, I was thinking about 4 of the MLI-65 mids.....

http://www.mach5audio.com/index-2.html

The amp I'll be using is an Orion 400.4. I'm looking for some really good midbass. It's all going into a 4dr blazer. What do you guys think would be a good route to go??? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

Click to read more...

 

[80INCHES 5,000+ posts]

If U Going Active Get The Mach 5 If U Going Passive Get The Re's

80

 

[req 5,000+ posts]

is there a frequency response graph for those mach 5 drivers anywhere?

 

[SaturnSC1 10+ year member]

I know this is a no0b question, but what exactly the difference between going active and passive?

 

[WillyG4444 10+ year member]

^^^^^^^^^^^ read the stickies above this thread..... exactly what you're looking for. Jeez

 

[SaturnSC1 10+ year member]

My fault, I commited a sin. I forgot to read the STICKIES! Ok, thats my repentance. Forgive me? Haha

 

[mvw2 10+ year member]

http://www.zaphaudio.com/6.5test/

Near the bottom, frequency response, distortion, decay, T/S parameters available too.

Too bad no RE's tested though...

When you're running dual drivers in an array, you have to take disperson characteristics into account. As well, it would be benificial for you to place them equaldistant from you so they are in sync, i.e.

|. . . . . (you)

|O

| O______