The 3004/2, trust me, I did a comparison on wednesday. I'm currently switching from 4 cvr's to 3 3004s.
ya learn somethin new everyday //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifThe CVX's are based off the L7.. CVRs are a step below the L5s...
way better then what? pioneer subs in general? if thats the case, thats not what he's asking...he's comparing the tsw3kspl, and i hightly doubt you've ever played with a tsw3ksplPioneer subs in my experience have been sub par. They are cheap, but overrated as far as powerhandling. The cvx is way better.
Have you had experience with the Premier line, or just the Pioneer line of subs?Pioneer subs in my experience have been sub par. They are cheap, but overrated as far as powerhandling. The cvx is way better.
I used to sell pioneer. The shop stoped carrying pioneer subs in stock because they were blowing very easily with the rms power on them. Was never impressed by pioneer subs in general.Have you had experience with the Premier line, or just the Pioneer line of subs?
The 3004/2SPL's are based off their 5002SPL (record holding sub) and can probably handle a lot more than 1kw thermally.
Better than the 3004.. Yes ive heard them many times. Its just my opionion. Love their headunits, but never was a fan of their subs at all.way better then what? ... i hightly doubt you've ever played with a tsw3kspl