Phoenix Gold Xenon Birth Sheet question

bchandler
10+ year member

Member
My new Xenon amp (x600.1) came with two birth sheets. One is a 8.5 x 11 printout with the amp's serial number, a graph, and some typed efficiency, current draw, etc numbers which states power is 842.35 watts. The other is a half sheet sized printout with handwritten model number, checks in the "passed" boxes, and a handwritten tested power of 617 watts. Both state power at 14.4 volts and 4 ohms. Which one is the accurate one? I would assume the one with all the specific numbers catered to my specific amp, but I wanted to make sure.

 
I would think it would be the other way around if anything. The printed sheet has the amp's serial number, date and time it was tested, a technician's signature, test voltage, current draw, efficiency, S/N ratio, and output all down to the one hundredths decimal place, and a plotted graph... All the other sheet has is checks in "passed" boxes, a technicians sig, and a handwritten output number, nothing else. I think I'm going to e-mail PG direct and see what they say.

 
if you dont belive or accept the answer to your question why the **** are u asking? you end up saying your going to email them. so why didnt you do that in the first place instead of wasting our time asking a question in which you wouldnt accept the answer to?

 
First of all, "reed dollaz," you douchebag e-thug, I posed a question in a polite and mature manner, and received an answer with no clarification as to why it was the correct answer. No offense to phyphoestilic, who may be a PG tech for all I know, but I was just trying to seek an affirmative answer a little more detailed than "the 2nd one with 617." Stay out of the thread so the adults can talk.

Anyone else have any useful info on the PG birthsheets? I did just e-mail PG and will post the reply here as soon as it comes in case anyone else is interested, even if I don't end up replying to this thread again...

 
First of all, "reed dollaz," you douchebag e-thug, I posed a question in a polite and mature manner, and received an answer with no clarification as to why it was the correct answer. No offense to phyphoestilic, who may be a PG tech for all I know, but I was just trying to seek an affirmative answer a little more detailed than "the 2nd one with 617." Stay out of the thread so the adults can talk.
Anyone else have any useful info on the PG birthsheets? I did just e-mail PG and will post the reply here as soon as it comes in case anyone else is interested, even if I don't end up replying to this thread again...


//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

id guess the 617 as well. the x600.1 in my girlfriends car came with a 620something birthsheet.

 
How does it sound? i have a few agonizing weeks before I can start my install!

I'd be fine with 617, its not like I will ever see that playing music anyway. And it's only powering an IDmax. It's just odd that they would include a detailed bench test sheet only for it to be a fake...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/ponder.gif.ec2527b23f1d287b60dcbba54f95edba.gif

 
iirc. wernt the x600.1's with the higher birthsheet, the first production series which had some problem (drawing a blank) and the ones with the lesser power , were made after they fixed whatever problem?

i may be lying to myself but i could of swown ive seen that somewhere...

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

bchandler

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
bchandler
Joined
Location
Florida
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
15
Views
1,166
Last reply date
Last reply from
Macklessdaddy
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top