jpexpc
10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Okay....I get the Ohms thing. I have been trying to figure out a way to phrase this question for Google with no luck. Here it goes:
My brother just bought 2 crappy 12" SVC 4 Ohm Kenwood subs.
He also bought a crappy 2-channel Sony amp.
Like most 2 channel-amps this amp is not stable at 2-Ohms bridged. Obviously he should have chosen 8-Ohm SVC subs or 4-Ohm DVC subs for this amp, but he didn't.
Getting a mono amp is also out of the question for now. He has to keep what he's got.
The amp pushes 800W @ 4 Ohms x 1 bridged. My question is this:
If the RMS running each sub to it's own channel is 125 watts @ 4 ohms, wouldn't it be better to bridge the amp and series the subs? I understand the impedance would raise to 8 Ohms but in reality wouldn't this create 400 watts at 8 Ohms?
It just seems like 8 Ohms bridged at 400 watts would be better than 125 watts x 2. Is my thinking wrong. Is my math wrong?
My brother just bought 2 crappy 12" SVC 4 Ohm Kenwood subs.
He also bought a crappy 2-channel Sony amp.
Like most 2 channel-amps this amp is not stable at 2-Ohms bridged. Obviously he should have chosen 8-Ohm SVC subs or 4-Ohm DVC subs for this amp, but he didn't.
Getting a mono amp is also out of the question for now. He has to keep what he's got.
The amp pushes 800W @ 4 Ohms x 1 bridged. My question is this:
If the RMS running each sub to it's own channel is 125 watts @ 4 ohms, wouldn't it be better to bridge the amp and series the subs? I understand the impedance would raise to 8 Ohms but in reality wouldn't this create 400 watts at 8 Ohms?
It just seems like 8 Ohms bridged at 400 watts would be better than 125 watts x 2. Is my thinking wrong. Is my math wrong?
