Plenty of bullshit on both sides, you've just got an ear for particular bullshit and it's only even on certain issues. In terms of the four you mentioned, what they all have in common is there was bullshit on both sides, but by the end it was decided that instead of picking out all of the bullshit and talking about the substance they'd lean into the democrat bullshit and grandstand about it with their own while shooing the continually mounting facts away as part of that bullshit.im neither democrat or republican both sides are idiots....i just know bullshit when i see it (democrats)
i would like you to show me these "facts" you keep talking about..i wanna see audio/video clips or actual evidence of these facts....
Bro, I don't have all day, just my lunch break. In general I'll say promises broken like single payer and many others, an insane amount of lies and misinformation -- including corona virus, a general whiny ***** attitude who needs constant praise like a child as pretty well summed up in this, a severe lack of constitutional values including some you'd probably care a lot about but also some you probably don't, the inability to be a leader in a time of crisis, and the division he spouts every single day leading us to hate each other when we often have similar values across party lines.or answer me this, what has trump done that has negatively impacted all people of the united states that makes him such a horrible person
Yes... and I am very offended by your statement and it needs to be corrected. I USED to blow tweeters.I don’t recall mentioning your name
Let me guess you’re chronic complainer that drives a Pontiac and blows tweeters?
Weird... I have made these statements and ask these questions... you get responses and I get bashed and called names. Lol silly people. You won't get straight answers on what Trump has done that is so wrong either because they can't answer directly because he is doing FAR more good than "wrong".i would like you to show me these "facts" you keep talking about..i wanna see audio/video clips or actual evidence of these facts....or answer me this, what has trump done that has negatively impacted all people of the united states that makes him such a horrible person
Sounds about right. You're absolutely hopeless.thats all just biased sourced information on the internet that somebody wrote up "fake news"....there are no facts, it was all bullshit
Nah you get it too, I honestly think you're moderately reasonable, you've just exhausted me by responding to 1/8th of a post and then moving the goal post. Although I'm sure it's a waste of time like all these people, I'm curious what he's done good. Surely that list is gargantuan if it's larger than the list of things he's fucked up.Weird... I have made these statements and ask these questions... you get responses and I get bashed and called names. Lol silly people. You won't get straight answers on what Trump has done that is so wrong either because they can't answer directly because he is doing FAR more good than "wrong".
I try to condense it down to the main point(s)... otherwise we all could be reading for days and days. One thing is for sure, we all see things differently. It is one of the reasons I like science. Provable Theory.Nah you get it too, I honestly think you're moderately reasonable, you've just exhausted me by responding to 1/8th of a post and then moving the goal post. Although I'm sure it's a waste of time like all these people, I'm curious what he's done good. Surely that list is gargantuan if it's larger than the list of things he's fucked up.
It is what it is, it's fun arguing with you at least because you're not coming from a disingenuous place or one completely devoid of nuance smiting down .gov sites and wiki as fake news lol.I try to condense it down to the main point(s)... otherwise we all could be reading for days and days. One thing is for sure, we all see things differently. It is one of the reasons I like science. Provable Theory.
Once you start censoring, you're a publisher and not a platform. I'm sure you've heard of section 230Nuance requires more words, I go into most statements thinking of what examples invalidate my point and try to include them and carve through the point to show where I stand between them. It doesn't help anyone to run from inconvenient truths or appear so partisan that you fully support the worst things someone's done, it especially doesn't help yourself.
Hindsight is 20/20, but history of a decade is taught in an hour. Antifa isn't an organization, BLM is, that's why it's so dumb to have them on a terrorist list, there's no members that aren't better labeled by another name. Basically everyone claiming to be representative of Antifa is a right winger missing the point of the name and trying to show they're violent and evil, like all of those facebook and twitter posts by Antifa_US which was linked to white supremacists later, after Trump retweeted them.
BLM might have gotten too big for its britches, because it's now hard for them to distance themselves from people who do things explicitly against how they require their members to behave during protests. Just like police they have no idea who these perpetrators are. You can only look at their requirements before protests to judge their organization and they're pretty peace-oriented if you can consider inconvenience peaceful.
I would say the line should be drawn under the same scrutiny of harassment in a civil court. If Alex Jones had said everything he did about random children who survived school shootings but instead had said it about Tom Hanks, then there's far less of an issue. The line should also be drawn when the whole point of the show is to get you scared about fluoride in the water and then sell you water filters. A left wing equivalent would still be just as wrong, but I don't know of any. Maybe there's an example you have. Episodes where Alex Jones just said mundane stuff like, "I'll eat your ***" aren't the problem if that makes it more clear it's not about him specifically. Also what he said about gay frogs was pretty funny because there's some modicum of truth to it like all good conspiracy theories, they just aren't "putting it in the water" on purpose. It's caused by people peeing after taking antidepressants lol. Fluoxetine affects frog *** drive, so it's more like it's making the frogs asexual. Episodes like that are also not really problematic enough to discourage his free speech, despite it being misinformation.
One thing that nobody seems to really understand about this though is that private companies can choose what happens on their platforms and like cancel culture, if your presence hinges on it then they'll lose customers. So what it sounds like when a bunch of conservatives complain about Youtube "killing their freedom of speech" by removing videos off their own servers is more like "Timmy's mom kicked me out of their home for calling her a ****, my freedom of speech has been violated." Free speech doesn't exist on Youtube.