Obama STILL *****!

if you watch the vids of the towers collapsing it was a demolition not a plane crash that caused the towers to fall
*facepalm*

You dont seem to know what a building implosion actually looks like. Nor do you seem to realize the logistics involved in imploding the WTC towers, with nobody noticing.

 
No Sir I am no idiot. You may be fine with being a sheep I am not nor will I ever be one. Do you have any idea how America was born?? America only exists because of war and death (member the British). People like me stood up one day and said I will not continue to be a sheep and they got off their ***** and did what had to be done. No people like you are the problem. You said it yourself your only out for you and yours. Why you so scared of death? I assure you that you will not have to seek out death as it will find you. WTF has happened in the world everybody is a me me me kind of person. Words and promises mean s hit in this world action is what makes stuff happen these days. I have no problem fighting and if so be it die for what is right. I will let the cowards run and hide in the hills. The difference between me and you is that I would fight and die for someone I don't know while you would watch them die as long as it did not affect you and yours. Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh sheep bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Do you have a job?

...bahhhh sheep bahhh bahhh..........................................................................

 
*facepalm*
You dont seem to know what a building implosion actually looks like. Nor do you seem to realize the logistics involved in imploding the WTC towers, with nobody noticing.
It's just so hard to believe 20-30 floors of concrete/steel would be too much weight for a broken support system to handle. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif

 
It's just so hard to believe 20-30 floors of concrete/steel would be too much weight for a broken support system to handle. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif
Ive read, and watched multiple programs, investigating the possibility of an inside job, mostly focusing on if the building were 'demolished'. The logistics involved in doing this, with nobody noticing, are astronomical. Astronomical. For the two towers to have been imploded, something like 30 feet of concrete would have had to have been burrowed/blasted through in order to gain access to the main support beams in the basement. One show I watched suggested that it would have taken a full crew of workers weeks, or more, to accomplish this. And the evidence of this major demolition project would have been widely noticeable. That crew never existed. Nobody saw them, no evidence this work was ever performed, period. The show also suggested a smaller crew, a covert operations sized crew that could manage this feat with relative safety from being discovered, would have taken months or years, and that's still ignoring how the material would have been transported away from the site unnoticed.

Also, if you watch the videos of the towers collapsing, its glaringly obvious the tops of the towers collapsed, crashing down on the rest of the structure, causing the complete failure. The towers did NOT collapse from the bottom up, as building implosions occur. Clearly, the buildings were not imploded from the bottom levels, again as building implosions typically occur. So this leaves only one way for the 'demolition theory' to be possible, an extremely atypical implosion by setting off charges up high in the structure, where the videos clearly show initial failure occurred. These floors of the towers, where the collapse originated, were all occupied. There was no demolition crew setting charges on those floors, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE to do that unnoticed. Impossible.

Then there's the 'fire doesnt melt steel' theory, or as I call it, the "the tv show The View is hosted by morons" theory. This theory has been tested. Jet fuel was used as a fire source, while a steel beam similar to those used in the WTC was placed above the fire. Its true the steel did not melt, it DID de-carbon to the point of failure, within 4 minutes, in this test. The superficial amount of weight placed on the beam for the test, was enough to collapse the beam into the fire, well within the time frame that occurred in the 9/11 disaster. TV talk show hosts are not scientists, and in most cases, they aren't even smart, obviously. Rosie O'Donnell should never, ever, be listened to on any subject that does not involve eating, or how morons think. She SHOULD be held accountable for opening her mouth and crying 'fire' in a crowded theater, when she obviously does not have the first clue what she is talking about.

If you want to educate yourself, watch the following link, and learn. If you just want to believe the conspiracy because you cant imagine the most simple and obvious possibility is true, ignore this link, and continue to live in ignorance.



Yep, the Nat Geo show that conducted this experiment brought in 'experts' who concluded the test is irrelevant. Keep in mind, both experts have personal reasons to doubt the test concludes the fire could have caused the collapse. One of the 'experts' has authored 8 books concluding just the opposite, for example, so obviously its not in his best interest to say 'oops, I guess my books are worthless, nobody buy them'. Both experts also mention 'over whelming evidence' that controlled demolition was the only possible way the collapse could occur, yet the only evidence they suggest is 'the buildings fell straight down much like a controlled implosion would create'. Hardly conclusive, definitely not 'over whelming'. And neither expert addressed the fact that not one single witness has come forward to say any sort of demolition crew, demolition apparatus, or even construction crew, was witnessed on these floors before the event. There will always be some wiggle room for conspiracy theorists and authors wanting to sell books to them, but imo its obvious that logic dictates the test proves the most simple conclusion is possible.

 
Damn, easy killer. My comment was sarcasm to the user who said 9/11 was an inside job. There wasn't any 'demolishing' involved, the weight from the floors above the impacts caused the buildings to fail.

Ive read, and watched multiple programs, investigating the possibility of an inside job, mostly focusing on if the building were 'demolished'. The logistics involved in doing this, with nobody noticing, are astronomical. Astronomical. For the two towers to have been imploded, something like 30 feet of concrete would have had to have been burrowed/blasted through in order to gain access to the main support beams in the basement. One show I watched suggested that it would have taken a full crew of workers weeks, or more, to accomplish this. And the evidence of this major demolition project would have been widely noticeable. That crew never existed. Nobody saw them, no evidence this work was ever performed, period. The show also suggested a smaller crew, a covert operations sized crew that could manage this feat with relative safety from being discovered, would have taken months or years, and that's still ignoring how the material would have been transported away from the site unnoticed.
Also, if you watch the videos of the towers collapsing, its glaringly obvious the tops of the towers collapsed, crashing down on the rest of the structure, causing the complete failure. The towers did NOT collapse from the bottom up, as building implosions occur. Clearly, the buildings were not imploded from the bottom levels, again as building implosions typically occur. So this leaves only one way for the 'demolition theory' to be possible, an extremely atypical implosion by setting off charges up high in the structure, where the videos clearly show initial failure occurred. These floors of the towers, where the collapse originated, were all occupied. There was no demolition crew setting charges on those floors, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE to do that unnoticed. Impossible.

Then there's the 'fire doesnt melt steel' theory, or as I call it, the "the tv show The View is hosted by morons" theory. This theory has been tested. Jet fuel was used as a fire source, while a steel beam similar to those used in the WTC was placed above the fire. Its true the steel did not melt, it DID de-carbon to the point of failure, within 4 minutes, in this test. The superficial amount of weight placed on the beam for the test, was enough to collapse the beam into the fire, well within the time frame that occurred in the 9/11 disaster. TV talk show hosts are not scientists, and in most cases, they aren't even smart, obviously. Rosie O'Donnell should never, ever, be listened to on any subject that does not involve eating, or how morons think. She SHOULD be held accountable for opening her mouth and crying 'fire' in a crowded theater, when she obviously does not have the first clue what she is talking about.

If you want to educate yourself, watch the following link, and learn. If you just want to believe the conspiracy because you cant imagine the most simple and obvious possibility is true, ignore this link, and continue to live in ignorance.

 
No Sir the only sheep I see is you. Now go hide behind your wife and kids and act like a big man till the s hit hits the fan and your true colors are reviled. Knowing I fought for such an outstanding citizen like you makes all the pain I had to endure well worth it. Don't worry I would still fight for you if and when that time comes. So you can sleep in peace tonight knowing real men are manning the fort so lil b itches like yourself can live a good life. Oh and your welcome you sorry SOB. Just remember this every lil thing you do today and take for granted is only possible because of people like me. But I am sure you could care less about that. Maybe one day you will become a man and grow a set of balls but it does not look like it will be today. I feel for your ole lady cause she picked one hell of a winner...

Just remember you are the one that turned this into a personal thing. Something I did not want to do.

 
Damn, easy killer. My comment was sarcasm to the user who said 9/11 was an inside job. There wasn't any 'demolishing' involved, the weight from the floors above the impacts caused the buildings to fail.
I didnt quote you to suggest you implied otherwise, quite the opposite. I was continuing your thought process.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

AlterEgo99

5,000+ posts
Streaming consciousness
Thread starter
AlterEgo99
Joined
Location
Domie Homie
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
153
Views
2,056
Last reply date
Last reply from
AlterEgo99
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top