It's just so hard to believe 20-30 floors of concrete/steel would be too much weight for a broken support system to handle. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif
Ive read, and watched multiple programs, investigating the possibility of an inside job, mostly focusing on if the building were 'demolished'. The logistics involved in doing this, with nobody noticing, are astronomical. Astronomical. For the two towers to have been imploded, something like 30 feet of concrete would have had to have been burrowed/blasted through in order to gain access to the main support beams in the basement. One show I watched suggested that it would have taken a full crew of workers weeks, or more, to accomplish this. And the evidence of this major demolition project would have been widely noticeable. That crew never existed. Nobody saw them, no evidence this work was ever performed, period. The show also suggested a smaller crew, a covert operations sized crew that could manage this feat with relative safety from being discovered, would have taken months or years, and that's still ignoring how the material would have been transported away from the site unnoticed.
Also, if you watch the videos of the towers collapsing, its glaringly obvious the tops of the towers collapsed, crashing down on the rest of the structure, causing the complete failure. The towers did NOT collapse from the bottom up, as building implosions occur. Clearly, the buildings were not imploded from the bottom levels, again as building implosions typically occur. So this leaves only one way for the 'demolition theory' to be possible, an extremely atypical implosion by setting off charges up high in the structure, where the videos clearly show initial failure occurred. These floors of the towers, where the collapse originated, were all occupied. There was no demolition crew setting charges on those floors, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE to do that unnoticed. Impossible.
Then there's the 'fire doesnt melt steel' theory, or as I call it, the "the tv show The View is hosted by morons" theory. This theory has been tested. Jet fuel was used as a fire source, while a steel beam similar to those used in the WTC was placed above the fire. Its true the steel did not melt, it DID de-carbon to the point of failure, within 4 minutes, in this test. The superficial amount of weight placed on the beam for the test, was enough to collapse the beam into the fire, well within the time frame that occurred in the 9/11 disaster. TV talk show hosts are not scientists, and in most cases, they aren't even smart, obviously. Rosie O'Donnell should never, ever, be listened to on any subject that does not involve eating, or how morons think. She SHOULD be held accountable for opening her mouth and crying 'fire' in a crowded theater, when she obviously does not have the first clue what she is talking about.
If you want to educate yourself, watch the following link, and learn. If you just want to believe the conspiracy because you cant imagine the most simple and obvious possibility is true, ignore this link, and continue to live in ignorance.
Yep, the Nat Geo show that conducted this experiment brought in 'experts' who concluded the test is irrelevant. Keep in mind, both experts have personal reasons to doubt the test concludes the fire could have caused the collapse. One of the 'experts' has authored 8 books concluding just the opposite, for example, so obviously its not in his best interest to say 'oops, I guess my books are worthless, nobody buy them'. Both experts also mention 'over whelming evidence' that controlled demolition was the only possible way the collapse could occur, yet the only evidence they suggest is 'the buildings fell straight down much like a controlled implosion would create'. Hardly conclusive, definitely not 'over whelming'. And neither expert addressed the fact that not one single witness has come forward to say any sort of demolition crew, demolition apparatus, or even construction crew, was witnessed on these floors before the event. There will always be some wiggle room for conspiracy theorists and authors wanting to sell books to them, but imo its obvious that logic dictates the test proves the most simple conclusion is possible.