numerous subs???

just kinda wondering, why do people lets say run four 10's at 1500 watts...

why not save your self and do like two 15's at 1500 watts???

i'm not seeing why people put more than two subs when you could just put more powerful subs, and less of them to equal it out

 
I was wondering something similar as far as sq goes. Wouldn't running anymore than 1 sub lower the sq in a vehicle because of less cancellation? Don't mean to threadjack.

 
I was wondering something similar as far as sq goes. Wouldn't running anymore than 1 sub lower the sq in a vehicle because of less cancellation? Don't mean to threadjack.
actually it would probably sound better at higher volumes with more woofers if done correctly.

 
4 10's have more surface area than 2 15's. If they both had 1500 watts and xmax was similar, the 10's would be louder. Assuming the box style was the same, Ie. ported, sealed.

 
I was wondering something similar as far as sq goes. Wouldn't running anymore than 1 sub lower the sq in a vehicle because of less cancellation? Don't mean to threadjack.
Subbass waves are too long to get cancellation from running multiple subs.

However, the advantage of running either multiple large subs or an array of smaller diameter subs is the increased cone area. Generally as excursion increases, distortion increases aswell. So the more cone area you have, the less excursion you need for a given output level, which should result in decreased distortion.

And for the output oriented....the more cone area you have, the more output you have for a given excursion level.

 
Subbass waves are too long to get cancellation from running multiple subs.
However, the advantage of running either multiple large subs or an array of smaller diameter subs is the increased cone area. Generally as excursion increases, distortion increases aswell. So the more cone area you have, the less excursion you need for a given output level, which should result in decreased distortion.

And for the output oriented....the more cone area you have, the more output you have for a given excursion level.
Thanks squeak, that's some good info.

 
1 10" sub, given 1.25" of useless measurement on each side for gasket and non-moving surround material, means an effective moving piston of ~7.5" in diameter.

This equates to ~44sqin, x 4 is 176sqin.

1 15" has ~12.5" effective cone area, which is 122sqin, x 2 is ~244sqin.

Sorry revots

 
I'm glad somebody said that. 2 10s more than 1 15 I think not. Did you know 3 12s is very close to 1 18?

As far as cancellation NO

As far as running multiple subs. Yes If you are able to put 1 trillion watts to a 15 inch sub how good is it gonna sound? I'd rather have more cone area (relates today as I'd much rather run 2 15" Fi SSDs than 1 BTL 15" w/ 3 times the power)

Original Question

The reason someone would run 4 10s over 2 15s

Answer

Your lookin' at around 4.4 CF needed for a nice enclosure for 410s and around 10CF for 215s.

TOPIC OVER

 
Or your like me and you buy your first system, then you decide to upgrade the subs to better 10" subs, then you have 4 10" subs with 2 of them sitting in the closet, then you decided to sell your amp and get a more powerful one to run 4 subs. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

a_steezy

Banned
Thread starter
a_steezy
Joined
Location
Renooo
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
39
Views
1,940
Last reply date
Last reply from
ronrico418
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top