I'm not flaming at all, only asking questions in response to your answers and statements.
If you can not or will not defend your answers/statements then perhaps they are not correct enough to post?
I take animal cruelty very personal in most cases. I understand the limits of possibilities and the need for some animals to be put down for safety or health reasons.
However, in this case there is no way any one can say this was justified or legal.
But we're talking about if the that dog has hunted before. I'm saying it was probably a farm dog. You say hunting. Now if it was a farm dog it probably did hunt but not a lot or it could of a lot. I'm saying I bet it started to kill farm animals and the farmer got pissed off and dumped it some were. So why shouldn't that guy get flamed also. I mean he tried to kill it in a worst way starvation. Who knows if that dog could of survived on its own.
