- Thread Starter
- #121
2.8 0-60, 11.0@ 1242.9 sec 0-60 is just stupid fast
those numbers are crazy for a stock V6
Dragtimes 2012 Nissan GT-R : 0-60 in 2.8 seconds , 11.0@124 mph | Nissan GT-R : Since 2007
2.8 0-60, 11.0@ 1242.9 sec 0-60 is just stupid fast
your kidding right?Sorry I didn't read the entire thread but if we want to compare cars then compare them apples to apples. How would the GT-R compare to a fully restored matching numbers '68? Price would be the same if the Camaro didn't cost more.
yes you do, nostalgia creeps into 90% of your post.Let me know when you realize I didnt nuthug anything. lol I stated a fact, which you cant dispute, which is why you are instead going off on this ridiculous tangent. You'd rather argue a point I never made, than admit you misunderstood what I originally said. Check your ego at the door, its serving you no good purpose here.
I was talking to the people who is saying the with the right amount if money any classic car could compete. If you buy a fully restored '68 with matching number you are looking around the same price tag as a GT-r if not more.your kidding right?
yes you do, nostalgia creeps into 90% of your post.
also I don't think I would like owning a gtr, every time you win a race you will hear, '' it was the car, if I had my **** I'd kill you"
My original point must really be terrifying to you, since you avoid it at all costs.yes you do, nostalgia creeps into 90% of your post.
ok the way I read it sounded like you thought it would compete.Chevrolet : Camaro Chevrolet : Camaro | eBay
Nissan : GT-R Nissan : GT-R | eBay
Compare the two now that price is out of the question.
I couldn't care enough to look it up to be honest.My original point must really be terrifying to you, since you avoid it at all costs.