NE1 know anything about this subs

We get guys like you all the time that come in here and base your theories on subwoofers on one parameter....and I hate to break it to you, that doesn't work. hmmm i think next time I buy a sub, im going to get one with an *** load of BL and super duper XMAX and my sub will prawn all....
seriously dude

http://www.bcae1.com

^^^take a vacation and read that entire site.
thanks for the site, i'm still learning, but what i said was and is my preference as i said in my original post.

 
Your post made me so mad, I had to made a picture. Subs have feelings too, jerk.
sadsubwoofer2aa.jpg
man oh man, //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif all i said was i prefer a sub with 90 something spl, not like i said a sub with 87 or so spl is crap, crazy, ****

 
I would not go under spl 92.5 db for a sub, anything under that is no good for me.
A little late, but that's because Swiss Audio is slow in responding to e-mails.

SPL (sensitivity) = 112+10*log(9.64*10^(-10)*Fs^3*(Vas/Qes))

For your subwoofer, the Swiss Audio SPL1291;

Fs = 35hz

Vas = 50.7L

Qes = .51

I'll leave the math up to you as I don't want to spoil anyone's fun, but just an FYI, you're subwoofer's true sensitivity is far less than 92.5db //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Infact, it's not even 88.5db //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif That's more than 4db less than your "personal minimum standard".

Brings things into light when you take the time to read past the marketing BS, and actually do the calculations.

 
A little late, but that's because Swiss Audio is slow in responding to e-mails.
SPL (sensitivity) = 112+10*log(9.64*10^(-10)*Fs^3*(Vas/Qes))

For your subwoofer, the Swiss Audio SPL1291;

Fs = 35hz

Vas = 50.7L

Qes = .51

I'll leave the math up to you as I don't want to spoil anyone's fun, but just an FYI, you're subwoofer's true sensitivity is far less than 92.5db //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Infact, it's not even 88.5db //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif That's more than 4db less than your "personal minimum standard".

Brings things into light when you take the time to read past the marketing BS, and actually do the calculations.

Thanks for the numbers, well that brings the whole question of marketing into question, or do u email every manufacturer for every sub?

 
Thanks for the numbers, well that brings the whole question of marketing into question, or do u email every manufacturer for every sub?
When the specs aren't given for a sub I'm looking at, e-mail or call.

However...what's your new take on this whole sensitivity situation...given I just proved you are using ~88.2db sensitive speakers when you claim that anything less than 92.5db is no good for you? Seems you've used those "93db sensitivity" subwoofers all this time just fine with no problems or complaints without knowing their true 88.2db sensitivity //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Your entire argument just flew out the window //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Open mouth. Remove foot.

 
When the specs aren't given for a sub I'm looking at, e-mail or call.
However...what's your new take on this whole sensitivity situation...given I just proved you are using ~88.2db sensitive speakers when you claim that anything less than 92.5db is no good for you? Seems you've used those "93db sensitivity" subwoofers all this time just fine with no problems or complaints without knowing their true 88.2db sensitivity //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Your entire argument just flew out the window //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Open mouth. Remove foot.

squeakers I wub j00

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

KnOkIn It 420

10+ year member
Poo Poo Broussard
Thread starter
KnOkIn It 420
Joined
Location
St. Rose Louisiana
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
40
Views
2,154
Last reply date
Last reply from
threedd97
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top