N Korea warned over second test

[bumpweLL.nYc 10+ year member]

It's really hard to concentrate on whether you have any objectivity. I am still trying to get over your ignorant comment about trying to figure out why we still have nukes.

well we initially used them because we didnt have the firepower to win the war. thats not the case now.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

well we initially used them because we didnt have the firepower to win the war. thats not the case now.

well it would be if we gave up ours, dam man.

 

[Ignatowski 5,000+ posts]

I think if "W" didnt lie to the public which he does ......big time.Still no weapons of mass destruction huh W,you know you went in there just for OIL ......

Wheres the support for the people and workers who cleaned up the WTC and are now left broke and without good medical support after 9/11@ WTC yup thats right,he denied them medical treatment and actually had it turned off ...

Now all those workers he took photo opps with and called heroes are suffering and not getting the medical attention they deserve

and had he and our government not dropped the ball in the Katrina disaster he wouldent be so hated...

They still havent done the right thing for our own citizens ....Why was he not down in louisana showing support for out own people? because they were poor and black ?

Sometimes you have to do things in life without any reward,you cant have an oil pipeline at the end of the rainbow....

 

[DaveT 10+ year member]

All I have to say is the world has been bought and sold.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

All I have to say is the world has been bought and sold.

friggin e-bay.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i think they used pay pal

 

[Calikid 5,000+ posts]

today in the news they announced that N. Korea second bomb was going to be twice as powerfull as the 1st one. So that means that now the second one can destroy two mailboxes.

 

[kickerlivinloud 10+ year member]

Well lets put it this way. If NK continues and gets nukes, they are most likely going to use them. Lets face it KJI has unbelieveable hate for most of the countries in the world (us most of all) Even if he doesn't attack us directly we could still easily be drawn into a nucular war. MAD (mutialy assured destruction) might be enough to stop NK from nuking us, but other contries arn't so lucky to have the power we do. Example, if NK attacks or even THREATENS Japan, we are bond by treaty to destroy them using OUR NUKES!!! This is not some bs crap made up. If Japan is threaten we are bond to use nukes.

Personally i'm not interested in a nucular war, I have a bad gut feeling about nukes, they just tend to ruin everthing. If NK contiues to test and later has nukes there will be nucular war. Its coming unless, we can do somthing to stop it. So I will support anything we can do to stop NK. Yea the US is pretty much the world police, honestly I wouldn't want it any other way. I don't think France or Russia, etc.. would be all that better

So quick recap:

Fact!!!!

Example, if NK attacks or even THREATENS Japan, we are bond by treaty to destroy them using OUR NUKES!!!

Lets face it KJI has unbelieveable hate for most of the countries in the world

The rest is pretty much my opinion

[/rant]

Jon

 

[Hundreth 10+ year member]

Clearly sarcasm, wit, and humor have no place here where everybody knows that all of the worlds problems are Bush's fault except for me. I don't like Bush, and really dislike how he is running the country, but NK had their nuclear research program going for a lot longer than the last 6 or 7 years and nobody has done anything about it because China wouldn't allow it. I know the hot thing to do if you are a musican/actor/coffee shop douchebag is to sit around and complain how all the worlds problems are because of goddam dubya, and make the easy joke "Oh, he's an idiot, really dumb" and I guess if that makes you all feel better that is fine with me. The world has been steadily going to shit, especially in the middle east and with NK, for a lot longer than Dubya has been in control of the US.

This is true. Right now we are in whats called the Reagan-Bush era, and its still going on. The US has been messing around since it started. Bush is just more blunt about it.

You can't blame any single entity for any of the world's problems, not bush, not the US, not North Korea, not Saddam, not Israel, not anyone. Its way more complex than that.

The real culprit to our problems is MONEY. Its these stupid multi-billion dollar corporations that dictate what our country does, not Bush. Globalization anyone? It doesn't help when the opposing sides to these corporations are a bunch of fanatic fundamentalists (and I'm not only refering to muslims,) who are just as retarded. Basically the state our world is in can only be expressed as retards vs retards, on every side.

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

Well lets put it this way. If NK continues and gets nukes, they are most likely going to use them. Lets face it KJI has unbelieveable hate for most of the countries in the world (us most of all) Even if he doesn't attack us directly we could still easily be drawn into a nucular war. MAD (mutialy assured destruction) might be enough to stop NK from nuking us, but other contries arn't so lucky to have the power we do. Example, if NK attacks or even THREATENS Japan, we are bond by treaty to destroy them using OUR NUKES!!! This is not some bs crap made up. If Japan is threaten we are bond to use nukes.
Personally i'm not interested in a nucular war, I have a bad gut feeling about nukes, they just tend to ruin everthing. If NK contiues to test and later has nukes there will be nucular war. Its coming unless, we can do somthing to stop it. So I will support anything we can do to stop NK. Yea the US is pretty much the world police, honestly I wouldn't want it any other way. I don't think France or Russia, etc.. would be all that better

So quick recap:

Fact!!!!

The rest is pretty much my opinion

[/rant]

Jon

i think the word your looking for is bound, not bond

 

[04redmach1]

I see you watch Jay Leno too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

today in the news they announced that N. Korea second bomb was going to be twice as powerfull as the 1st one. So that means that now the second one can destroy two mailboxes.

 

[Hundreth 10+ year member]

All I have to say is the world has been bought and sold.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/clap.gif.178cba2c538c68e720c727fcb024b19c.gif

 

[Ignatowski 5,000+ posts]

its a shame how fvcked up the human race is..........

we wont be happy till everyones dead

 

[bikejunkie223 10+ year member]

Well lets put it this way. If NK continues and gets nukes, they are most likely going to use them. Lets face it KJI has unbelieveable hate for most of the countries in the world (us most of all) Even if he doesn't attack us directly we could still easily be drawn into a nucular war. MAD (mutialy assured destruction) might be enough to stop NK from nuking us, but other contries arn't so lucky to have the power we do. Example, if NK attacks or even THREATENS Japan, we are bond by treaty to destroy them using OUR NUKES!!! This is not some bs crap made up. If Japan is threaten we are bond to use nukes.
Personally i'm not interested in a nucular war, I have a bad gut feeling about nukes, they just tend to ruin everthing. If NK contiues to test and later has nukes there will be nucular war. Its coming unless, we can do somthing to stop it. So I will support anything we can do to stop NK. Yea the US is pretty much the world police, honestly I wouldn't want it any other way. I don't think France or Russia, etc.. would be all that better

So quick recap:

Fact!!!!

The rest is pretty much my opinion

[/rant]

Jon

i think the word your looking for is bound, not bond

The other word you are looking for is nuclear

BTW if they threaten Japan than the only thing that will happen is more threats and idle rhetoric from the UN. Even if NK does nuke somebody, I still doubt any other country would break thiers out, unless it was Israel (who is widely believed to have nukes but is not confirmed) Nukes going off in the open atmosphere cause global problems. I hardly think the US wants a nice fat cloud of radioactive fallout to cruise over Japan and then continue on to the west coast. I think large scale carpet bombing would be the retribution, and it wouldn't be just us doing it, we would probably make China do it since NK is thier goddam toy. All of that is my opinion based on no facts whatsoever, just my impression on what would happen.

 

[Hundreth 10+ year member]

The other word you are looking for is nuclear
BTW if they threaten Japan than the only thing that will happen is more threats and idle rhetoric from the UN. Even if NK does nuke somebody, I still doubt any other country would break thiers out, unless it was Israel (who is widely believed to have nukes but is not confirmed) Nukes going off in the open atmosphere cause global problems. I hardly think the US wants a nice fat cloud of radioactive fallout to cruise over Japan and then continue on to the west coast. I think large scale carpet bombing would be the retribution, and it wouldn't be just us doing it, we would probably make China do it since NK is thier goddam toy. All of that is my opinion based on no facts whatsoever, just my impression on what would happen.

Israel has had nukes for years... and no, they wouldn't break them out unless their *** was on the LINE.