Megalomaniac 5,000+ posts
Mr.SQ
atkins?lose weight //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
atkins?lose weight //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
How would a larger arternator take care of the draw issue? The more current is demanded of the alt, the more it produces. The more it produces, the more draw it pulls down on the motor. The draw from a 100 amp alt to create 100 amps (for example) would be approximately the same as the draw from a 200 amp alt pulling 100 amps. So increasing the alternator size, while helping the charging system's voltage most likely, will not really change the draw on the engine at all. And chances are the vast majority of performance loss he's feeling (acceleration AND braking) is due to added weight, not draw from the alternator.^ don't start another one of these cap threads guys. Everyone has their own opinions and don't clutter this guys thread up with worthless babble.
An alternator would for sure take care of the draw issue.
I was sugguesting an alternator from a voltage standpoint because that was the problem I thought he was asking about, not because of his engine's performance.How would a larger arternator take care of the draw issue? The more current is demanded of the alt, the more it produces. The more it produces, the more draw it pulls down on the motor. The draw from a 100 amp alt to create 100 amps (for example) would be approximately the same as the draw from a 200 amp alt pulling 100 amps. So increasing the alternator size, while helping the charging system's voltage most likely, will not really change the draw on the engine at all. And chances are the vast majority of performance loss he's feeling (acceleration AND braking) is due to added weight, not draw from the alternator.
For weight, going to a single driver system is a good idea. Another idea would be spending the extra $ on birch plywood rahter than mdf for the enclosure, its quite a bit lighter.
Adding a cap was just a hillarious joke.... that was a joke right?
atleast I'm not the ONLY one talking sense.How would a larger arternator take care of the draw issue? The more current is demanded of the alt, the more it produces. The more it produces, the more draw it pulls down on the motor. The draw from a 100 amp alt to create 100 amps (for example) would be approximately the same as the draw from a 200 amp alt pulling 100 amps. So increasing the alternator size, while helping the charging system's voltage most likely, will not really change the draw on the engine at all. And chances are the vast majority of performance loss he's feeling (acceleration AND braking) is due to added weight, not draw from the alternator.
For weight, going to a single driver system is a good idea. Another idea would be spending the extra $ on birch plywood rahter than mdf for the enclosure, its quite a bit lighter.
Adding a cap was just a hillarious joke.... that was a joke right?
Why dont you think a HO alt would help stiffen system voltage? It certainly should, even for transient response. If after adding a HO you still have transient voltage dipping problems, you have too much resistance in your wiring/connections most likely.HO alts don't address dynamic current draw, only long term current draw. If the problem is voltage dips with music transients, an alt isn't a fix. A cap doesn't hold enough charge to make much of a difference on its own. A second battery is a much better solution.