audioholic
5,000+ posts
not a moderator
Again more BS. You said originally if there was no witness, there was no crime. It doesn't take a Harvard graduate to see the flaws in your theory. Our laws simply do not work that way, sorry.actually i do, ive been in the situation quite a few times, on both sides... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif why do you think the police write a report and tell you to goto the magistrates office and file your own complaint //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/suicide.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif
just like if someone breaks into your home you cant shoot them in a room with a window, dont believe me, ask the next police officer you see //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Now, if you were to make the arguement that with no witness, the crime is more difficult to prove, and local officers may even try to dishearten you from filing a complaint, you might make your case... but a crime was most definitely committed. You, in your own words, admit the person in your example 'assaulted' someone, then claim there 'was no crime' merely due to nobody else seeing it. No, I dont need to ask the next cop I see in a mall to know taking legal advice from you is like taking driving advice from Ray Charles.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif , //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif and oh yeah... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/suicide.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif