Yeah....ported. They have pretty limited linear excursion compared to the other two drivers with only minimally more cone area.L7's get loud
And the Rl-p's can get louder, sound just as good (and better, IMO), and only cost minimally more than unauthorized L7's (the SS's would have full warranty). Plus Mike is flat out one of the best people to deal with.i still say L7, they can get loud sealed and ported and they can sound good. they also saves u moneywhich is always a plus
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif And if you hang around a little bit, you'll realize SBLAZER is someone you don't generally want to listen to //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifyes this has to be sealed people some people say L7's sucked sealed but sblazar has named numerous times that they are great sealed subs.
Specs don't lie //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif The L7's is simply outdisplaced by both drivers.But if squeak is right saying that Mags and Rl-p are louder then the L7's sealed then I'm prob going to go with those since I know the sound quaitly will be better.
the mags will **** the w7 in sq hands downas far as output i'm not sure i never tested that
80
How much power? From a linear displacement standpoint, the W7 comes out on top in both 12" and 15" (13.5"). The Mag may get as loud, but either because the W7 wasn't reaching full potential, enclosure differences or the Mag was exceeding it's linear excursion limit.new Mag is better SQ wise than the W7 and slightly more output than a W7. I've tested them both.