Lanzar Opti 1535D, thoughts?

Optimum would be 1.3net @ 37Hz for the vented side, 3.8net sealed side. Sounds crazy, but that gives a +/-3dB response (anechoic) of 22Hz to 60Hz.
That's the default box that WinISD recommends, but that sound pretty far fetched to me, imo...

But I am using a 4th order too so we shall see

 
i cant wait till it gets here

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nerd.gif.c6fa51ddf7ff75f1c0371fbc648f70ae.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/santa.gif.e1ec9cf2e0a0dd232ad35aa594a126d0.gif:*******://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cuddle.gif.bd1b29c179c0482f8313dbd790b74c94.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/drool.gif.b5e863e893038027711d4402f340dad0.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/offwall.gif.29a91b9b265d47af4b8e33fc5b558d18.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/sneaky.gif.7189749b3a3f769e8815b47e8ae87f88.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/woot.gif.aaa6090e619a97b6090d16dd863c5a69.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryexcited.gif.c26a15f316d23068607f36ddacd7a7ab.gif

 
**** is that freq response accurately modeled? Sounds like a very flat curve for a bandpass box.
Properly tuned bandpasses are flat, just not alot of subs like them very well, need a low EBP for decent freq response in 4th order BP

That's the default box that WinISD recommends, but that sound pretty far fetched to me, imo...
But I am using a 4th order too so we shall see
When you take into account how far above Fs tuning is, you realize that the vented side would need to be smaller than standard 4th order vented just to keep gain down and the response at as low of a ripple as possible lol. Go any bigger and there will be a very noticeable spike around tuning, go any smaller and you'll notice a loss below Fs that high qts woofers should not have when dealing with the slope made possible by the sealed chamber. Only thing WinIsd cannot be used for is to model the inductance spawned upper end natural roll-off and circle port calculations (since it figures everything in with aero style coefficients.

 
I guess I'm going to listen to WinISD then and go with 2.7 ported, 7.24 sealed, tuned to 38, 55 sq in of port area. Any objections?
I hope it sounds like dog shit

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/sneaky.gif.7189749b3a3f769e8815b47e8ae87f88.gif

 
dafssdfsa.png


hm

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

power-fanatic07

5,000+ posts
Knockin Doors Down
Thread starter
power-fanatic07
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
36
Views
6,140
Last reply date
Last reply from
RAM_Designs
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top