Is this picture photoshopped?

Photoshopped?

  • YES!

    Votes: 40 59.7%
  • No waiz

    Votes: 9 13.4%
  • OMG A ARROWED DEER!

    Votes: 7 10.4%
  • AWESOME regardless.

    Votes: 11 16.4%

  • Total voters
    67
It was posted on a hunting forum..Supposedly the picture was taking with a trail camera, right as the guy released his arrow. Every time an unusual picture is posted, people go around screaming photoshop on the forum.
The pic does not look photoshopped to me, but I guess it could be done. I have no experience with photoshop and know several of you do..

So is it, or is it not?

CDY_0021c.jpg
This is what happened:

the deer is dead, laying on the ground, they snaped a image of it and cut the deer out of the photo with photoshop.

Then pasted the deer by it self into this current photo, and tried to blend it (horribly might I add).

I could have done a better job with raw material in an hour. (darkened the picture of appear to match color intensity of the deer) (deer was photographed around 7:00-8:00 p.m. and the picture of the back ground looks to be 2- 3pm.

Made the deer more blurred to appear he was runing.

Cut him out a little smoother

Add blood splatter to make it appear that his wound is leaking whilst he is running.

etc.....

 
It was posted on a hunting forum..Supposedly the picture was taking with a trail camera, right as the guy released his arrow. Every time an unusual picture is posted, people go around screaming photoshop on the forum.
The pic does not look photoshopped to me, but I guess it could be done. I have no experience with photoshop and know several of you do..

So is it, or is it not?

CDY_0021c.jpg


2mm7i3k.jpg


 
I put 'no way' but I meant 'it is photoshopped.' The blood splatter isn't consistant with where that arrow landed.

And... I just realized the original is shown above. I'm dumb.

 
As for the transparent tail, I have several pictures myself of deer on motion that appear "ghostly" or "transparent". Its just due to the slow shutter speeds on these cameras.
I was about to say that.

i made myself "see thru" in one pic by getting the settings just right.

I must be fake.

but who the **** really cares? Its a ****in deer.

 
I put 'no way' but I meant 'it is photoshopped.' The blood splatter isn't consistant with where that arrow landed. And... I just realized the original is shown above. I'm dumb.
Lol, I photo shopped the arrow and blood out. I also added the wildlife tag and changed date.

Point being, Unless you took the pic your self, there no real way of telling.

 
http://tineye.com/login

I didn't find any other pictures using Tineye with the image link. So it WAS an original photo by that person.

9/20/08 7:02 P.M.

@ProjectPechkin

Idk about you, but here at this time of year the sun is still up in the West. If that camera is facing West, the sun is still in the sky. If that deer is dead laying on the ground (which I already stated can't be possible) it's head would be tilted upwards because of it's antlers. It's head is facing straight forward. Also possibly it's tongue my be sticking out if it was dead.

Everyone that says it's fake is just looking at the arrow and blood. You need to look at all aspects. Most of you have never seen a deer moving through one of those cams. That's how they look most of the time!

This picture seems fine by me.

 
Look at the angle of the arrow.

He'd have to be up in a tree to get that angle since the deer was in mid air.

According to the fact that he said he took the pic as he released the arrow.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Captain_Ahab

5,000+ posts
BUCK FAMA
Thread starter
Captain_Ahab
Joined
Location
Da Dirty Souf
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
61
Views
1,844
Last reply date
Last reply from
Rashaddd
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top