HUGE deer i shot in NOV.

ok well opening day here was nov. 12th. so i got up about 5:30 and drove from my grandparents house about 8 miles t our land and right at daylight i could hear some movement and a grunt about every couple minutes, so i did a little rattleing and grunted a couple times and he came in ready for a fight just upwind of me so i basicly just pulled up and took the shot, i had the first shot of the morning and two days latere i got a call from outdoor life magazine and they wanted to do an interview with me on the 3rd of january.

 
I want to see him post up a pic with his username and the date on it.
ok i am at my families intexas and we are getting ready to go to hooters and eat but as soon as i get back i will definately take one.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
ohdeer3.jpg


ohdeer1.jpg


i shot this deer when i noticed he was trying to steal my internets

 
Its awesome when they come in looking for a fight..Have only called in one who did that, and it was the 7 pointer I posted when I got back from my ban..

They come in walking stiff legged, hair standing up on their neck, ready to kick some ***!

Did anyone know a deer of this caliber was in the area?

Buddy of mines dad killed a 158" 9 -pointer 2 1/2 weeks ago and noone had ever seen him before.

 
that deer has no hind legs..Lmfao
Why would someone go through the trouble to put him up there, even as a prank?
A lot of deer are like that. They learn to overcome and they build up uberdeer strength in their fronts (rearfill is not necessary). I bet that is why the deer was able to pull itself up there.

 
The defence lawyer of a Mississippi man charged with having *** with a dead deer is claiming he's innocent of any wrongdoing - because a "crimes against ****** morality" statute prohibits *** with animals, but fails to mention carcasses, The Duluth News Tribune reports.
The man, only identified as "Deehunt1988", 19, of Mississippi, was arrested on "a misdemeanour charge of ****** gratification with an animal" after indulging in intercourse with said deceased deer on 11 October.

His attorney, public defender Fredric Anderson, last week filed a motion with a Douglas County court which argued "because the deer was dead, it was not considered an animal and the charge should be dismissed". He wrote: "The statute does not prohibit one from having *** with a carcass."

He further argued that, according to Webster's dictionary, an animal is "any of a kingdom of living beings". If you include carcasses in that definition, Anderson reasoned, "you really go down a slippery slope with absurd results".

Anderson demanded that a judge clarify "what the Legislature intended 'animal' to mean in the statute", insisting: "And the only clear point to draw the line in that definition, I believe, is the point of death."

Assistant district attorney James Boughner countered by saying that the court could indeed use a dictionary to determine the meaning of a word, but isn't obliged to do so. He told Judge Michael Lucci that "when a person's pet dog dies, the person still refers to the dog as his or her dog, not a carcass".

"It stays a dog for some time," Boughner added, noting that Hathaway himself had referred to the dead deer as exactly that, and not a carcass, when confronted by police.

Brougher concluded by stating the "statute was on punishing the human behaviour, not protecting animals".

"It does not seem to draw a line between the living and the dead," he noted. Interpreting the statue to exclude carcasses would, moreover, "also exclude freshly killed animals", Boughner insisted. This, in turn, "could lead to people who commit such acts with animals to kill them".

Boughner's latter point seems to be backed up by Hathaway's previous form, which saw him in April 2005 plead "no contest to one felony charge of mistreatment of an animal for the shooting death of Bambrick, a 26-year-old horse, to have *** with the animal".

Judge Lucci summed the matter up concisely with: "I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been tackled before in another case." He then promised to render a decision before Hathaway's next court appearance on 1 December.

Hathaway faces a possible nine months' jail and a fine of up to $10,000 on the deer *** rap, but if convicted, "could serve a prison term of up to two years because of a previous conviction".
interesting

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Liquid Bass

10+ year member
Midwest Militia
Thread starter
Liquid Bass
Joined
Location
KC Missouri
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
148
Views
2,526
Last reply date
Last reply from
WhoSayWho?
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top