No, the protection light came on to the newer amp when i tried wiring both amps up to the svc sub.
Surprise, surprise.
It wasn't until trial and error that I realized that the protection light came on simply because i had wired an extra remote wire from one amp to the other amps remote wire, and the new amp didn't like it.
See above response. I'd say you were absolutely wrong here as jumping the remote activation input to another amp is a pretty common practice for some. Provided you aren't jumping 5, 6, or 20 things off of the remote activation output from your head unit this shouldn't be a concern.
I'm quite confident that when i bridged the four channel amp to one sub, that the sub's cone moved much greator than it did when only bridged from two channels, i'd say that the sub was getting at least %60 more watts.
I am
supremely confident you are again, positively 100% wrong. You don't wire a 4 channel amp to have all four channels' output powering the same driver. It----Simply-----Won't------Happen. We're not trying to act superior on this point, fella. It is just inarguable fact. Amps are not built to be configured that way.
I didn't know everything to begin with
Apparently, no matter how hard people have tried to correct the situation, you
still know less than nothing about the proper implementation of aftermarket car audio gear. You will
not (or at the very least shouldn't) wire a 4-channel amp with all 4 channels on a single speaker. You do not (again, at least
should not) wire multiple amplifiers to a single voice coil driver, no matter your feelings to the contrary. .
after hearing nothing but ********, i decided the only way was trial and error...
Heavy emphasis on the error part, friend. Do it your way if you insist and we truly hope you enjoy repeatedly destroying defenseless stereo equipment for your trouble. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif