How long do police have to file charges?

[Ken448 10+ year member]

I must have taken a shit in your cheerios once and just can't remember. lawl
Its the only logical explanation for your current stupidity.

Nope, I just think you are an ******* and try to treat everyone like shit. I can be an internet hard *** just like you, hell, maybe I will be just as cool when I am a post whore like you as well.. Nah, I have a life.. Cant spend my entire day on a forum.. You have a good time though!

 

[Ken448 10+ year member]

Who was I trying to treat like shit?
I really did make you cry before, and you resent it huh.

THAT'S HILARIOUS! HAHAHAHOHOHEHEHAHAHAHAHA!™

Here's the kicker. I don't remember it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

Nope, didnt make me cry.. Sorry *** monkey.... And gee I wonder how you could not remember doing something.. all you do is post here.. Wow your life ROCKS BRAVO!!!!!! Good day *** monkey, I am done with this thread..

 

[klaze]

Aint that a mother ****er.

The drunk driver has the better lawyer

How funny is it that a DRUNK DRIVER hit a DRUNK PEDESTRIAN!

If the driver had been sober he may have been able to avoid the accident.

But if the girl had been sober she wouldn't have been pole dancing in the middle of the highway.

Judge Judy would have a field day with this.

 

[TulsaMike 10+ year member]

havent read everything, but from what i read on the first page, i hope she learned her lesson and next time she wont be drinking underage and playing in the street

 

[crunktimes.com 5,000+ posts]

When I was 15 I had a GF that was 18 and she used to get smashed and do dumb shit like go start fights with people and go lay in the middle of the road all trashed.

I really hated her and kind of always hoped someone would not see her and just run her *** over. I was too much of a puss back then to break up with her and I liked having my peen touched so I put up with it for a good three months before she got put in the nut house.

There is my contribution

 

[BreakingBad]

ok first, the situation was she was inside drinking with her friends (cmon now, who HASNT drank underage) in a safe environment, causing no trouble.

well, her mom is an alcoholic, a severe one. her father had just passed away, and i guess her mom drank and started actin all weird towards my friend, and my friend started to cry (mom called her names, said her father - who passed away - would have hated the way she turned out - yet this girl is role model material)...anyway, she went outside to cry. her boyfriend was getting out of his car, and she came down to his car, crossed the street and this dude came speeding through and cracked her.

i dont know all the details, but thats what she tells me. i have no idea what she's suing for, but her attorney apparently told her they will be bringing charges against her for an underage...

 

[BreakingBad]

and to the ******* who said she "shouldnt have been in the middle of the road"...

this was a residential street ya ****.... so, what, according to 22mountainfag people aren't allowed to go outside now?

its the drivers fault, 100% liability. he even admitted it to the police on the scene, apparently.

 

[slick rick 10+ year member]

and to the ******* who said she "shouldnt have been in the middle of the road"...
this was a residential street ya ****.... so, what, according to 22mountainfag people aren't allowed to go outside now?

its the drivers fault, 100% liability. he even admitted it to the police on the scene, apparently.

Like I stated in a previous post depends on what the state uses: contributory or comparative. A small example from an outline I own...so if she was in the street negligently, the verdict might not be as clear cut as it appears.

Chapter 11

DEFENSES IN NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS

I. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE

A. General rule: At common law, the doctrine of contributory negligence applies. The doctrine provides that a plaintiff who is negligent, and whose negligence contributes proximately to his injuries, is totally barred from recovery. [246 - 247] (Example: P, while crossing the street, fails to pay attention. D, traveling at a high rate of speed while drunk, hits and kills P. Had P behaved carefully, he would have been able to get out of the way. Even though D’s negligence is much greater than P’s, P will be totally barred from recovery because of his contributory negligence, if the doctrine applies.)

 

[BreakingBad]

Like I stated in a previous post depends on what the state uses: contributory or comparative. A small example from an outline I own...so if she was in the street negligently, the verdict might not be as clear cut as it appears.
Chapter 11

DEFENSES IN NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS

I. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE

A. General rule: At common law, the doctrine of contributory negligence applies. The doctrine provides that a plaintiff who is negligent, and whose negligence contributes proximately to his injuries, is totally barred from recovery. [246 - 247] (Example: P, while crossing the street, fails to pay attention. D, traveling at a high rate of speed while drunk, hits and kills P. Had P behaved carefully, he would have been able to get out of the way. Even though D’s negligence is much greater than P’s, P will be totally barred from recovery because of his contributory negligence, if the doctrine applies.)

she just txt'd me back. she said the police have her BAC results, .168

but i still dont see how she was negligent because she was in the street...she was well aware, attempted to avoid the driver, and he still hit her.

 

[slick rick 10+ year member]

she just txt'd me back. she said the police have her BAC results, .168
but i still dont see how she was negligent because she was in the street...she was well aware, attempted to avoid the driver, and he still hit her.

not arguing either way...just stating if she was negligent in her adventures in the street, that in a contributory negligence state, driver might not be liable. However, most states use comparative negligence anyway. PA uses this:

Pennsylvania has adopted a modified rule of comparative negligence. A plaintiff's recovery is barred only if his contributory negligence is greater than the causal negligence of the defendants against whom recovery is sought. Otherwise, the plaintiff's damages are diminished in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to him. 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7102(a) (Westlaw 2007)

you can possibly recover!

 

[DjiNN 10+ year member]

It pisses me off with all these people out here trying to get free money. Like my buddy getting in a FENDER BENDER and all of them crying about there necks and backs so they could get some tabs for free for a few months and then them getting 100k from the other insurance company. They have NOTHING to show for that 100k accept getting ****ed up for 2 months.. After that he quit his job because of college and was able to draw unemployment.. Pisses me the hell off..
Her dumbass shouldnt have been in the road in the first place. Just because someone doing what she was and happened to hit her doesnt mean she should be able to sue him.. Does she not think it was even part of her fault? IDK, I guess I just think you should have to work for what you get..

I agree totally with your statement .. but in my own case .. my whole left side is fuked .. i cant even stay seated driving more than 2 hrs .. if i do my leg starts to being bothering me and my left shoulder and neck area gives me constant pain.

 

[captaincheesey 10+ year member]

she just txt'd me back. she said the police have her BAC results, .168
but i still dont see how she was negligent because she was in the street...she was well aware, attempted to avoid the driver, and he still hit her.

Wow, double the limit if you are legal. The courts will have fun with that little fact, but if the driver admitted 100% fault, and it is recorded on paper, she can probably get off with a lighter sentence, and some cash from getting hit. Lucky for her would be they charge her a fine, and just deduct that amount from what she gets from the other driver.