Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
The government is a bunch of bullshit anyways. We need to rethink our strategies at how to actually run a country.
Why do you hire people? Maybe you could just fire everyone and make $175k!.wtf does it matter if payroll is pre tax or not? my company takes in $250k and i have a $50k payroll and pay $50k in taxes. so if pre tax hike i end up with $150kish sweet. i am going to still take home that 150k even after they raise taxes. so now, i start with $250k, Taxed $75k, payroll only getting $25k. see where im going
Yes, but what I'm saying is that taxes don't prohibit companies from hiring people. There isn't a company in the world that says "I can't hire anymore people because taxes are too high!" because payroll is deductible. Payroll taxes included. And being that businesses hire to serve a demand (darn! I gave away the answer to my question above) and not for the good of the community, taxes have no direct effect on hiring.Hmm. What are payroll taxes then? You do realize that having something as a tax deduction does not mean it counter-balances taxes due, right?
Think again about everything government does and come back. Our standard of living would be nothing compared to what it is not without government. Too many people take it for granted or just don't understand.The government is a bunch of bullshit anyways. We need to rethink our strategies at how to actually run a country.
*woosh* The sound of csu's point going right over your head. You are so busy trying to think 3 steps ahead to look witty, that you've lost sight of the fact that you were checkmated a while ago.Why do you hire people? Maybe you could just fire everyone and make $175k!.
I absolutely love all the arrogance in everything you say. You come up with the worst logic ever, or say something so elementary a small child would understand, then act like you are the first person ever to have such an intellectual break through. Gosh you are so right, all those people who dont realize the benefits of not living in a lawless society of anarchy would surely vote Democrat if they only had a brain.Think again about everything government does and come back. Our standard of living would be nothing compared to what it is not without government. Too many people take it for granted or just don't understand.
My secretary usually types out the longer replies for me while I dictate them to her. The other times, yes I do have one of those thingamabobbies, because Im paralyzed from the next down. Well, not really paralyzed so much as just lazy is I guess.Christ, Holic. Do you have one of those speak into text thingamabobbies? If not, you sure do write lots of those word thingys pretty fast.
Anyway, my coffee break is over. You guys play nice.
see belowWhy do you hire people? Maybe you could just fire everyone and make $175k!.
*woosh* The sound of csu's point going right over your head. You are so busy trying to think 3 steps ahead to look witty, that you've lost sight of the fact that you were checkmated a while ago.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
i need a new secretary. i have to do my own typingMy secretary usually types out the longer replies for me while I dictate them to her. The other times, yes I do have one of those thingamabobbies, because Im paralyzed from the next down. Well, not really paralyzed so much as just lazy is I guess.
1. To do work so i dont have toWhy do you hire people? Maybe you could just fire everyone and make $175k!.
Yes, but what I'm saying is that taxes don't prohibit companies from hiring people. There isn't a company in the world that says "I can't hire anymore people because taxes are too high!" because payroll is deductible. Payroll taxes included. And being that businesses hire to serve a demand (darn! I gave away the answer to my question above) and not for the good of the community, taxes have no direct effect on hiring.
Think again about everything government does and come back. Our standard of living would be nothing compared to what it is not without government. Too many people take it for granted or just don't understand.
I was talking more of federal government, but not state.Think again about everything government does and come back. Our standard of living would be nothing compared to what it is not without government. Too many people take it for granted or just don't understand.
*woosh* The sound of my point going right over your head.*woosh* The sound of csu's point going right over your head. You are so busy trying to think 3 steps ahead to look witty, that you've lost sight of the fact that you were checkmated a while ago.
So was I.I was talking more of federal government, but not state.
I find it interesting how you seem to put more thought in my responses to other people than in my responses to you. Look how hard YOU try to say something smart.I absolutely love all the arrogance in everything you say. You come up with the worst logic ever, or say something so elementary a small child would understand, then act like you are the first person ever to have such an intellectual break through. Gosh you are so right, all those people who dont realize the benefits of not living in a lawless society of anarchy would surely vote Democrat if they only had a brain.
Usually you wait for someone to mention that Republicans are (suppose to be) for smaller govt before you retort with your vision of our landscape with NO government. Because you are unable, or unwilling, to discern between smaller govt, and no govt. And this time you didnt even wait that long, Buck was merely making the point we need to change HOW we are governed, not whether or not we should have govt at all. But you apparently missed that little detail in your aggressive enthusiasm to say something smart.
lul
Idk, man. It's tough to say what would happen, only time would tell. I just believe the federal government needs to back off some.So was I.
No, it doesn't. Taxes could be 100% and businesses could still hire as many people as they need to serve their demand. And being that businesses only hire to serve their demand, if demand doesn't go down, employment won't go down. There may be some pseudo effects of taxation on employment, but that's really only lag from a change in demand or over-hiring anyway.less money because of taxes means less money to spend on payroll.
Government has been backing off for 30 years. Look at where it was brought us.I just believe the federal government needs to back off some.
Won't disagree there/Not only that, there needs not to be so many idiots in America that don't know how to spend there money or raise children.
And I put there instead of their. Wasn't that a great example //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gifGovernment has been backing off for 30 years. Look at where it was brought us.
Won't disagree there/