Dirtrider4eva
10+ year member
√\_The CaUsE__
Have you ever had a good or a bad experience with an amp and want to share about it?
tell your story here.
i was thinking about this, and thought people should post their opinions on amps in here!
we all research amps, but we want personal hand held review.
so ill lay down mine, and hope you all add!
Zapco ref 360.2
good:
small size, nice crossover, crisp sound,
would recommend. not heavily underated.
bad:
terminals are the lame Phillips head
hifonics zeus zxi60.4 + 1k
good:
it felt really solid, looked nice, put out the power.
does rated plus 5%-10%
bad:
lame plastic mounting terminals
it gets real hot
Memphis big belle
good: attractive.
built solid. sounded pretty well. does rated.
bad:
end caps are hard to find.
angled terminals arent the best.
to use all 5 channels you either have to use 1 rca for the sub amp,
or it will process the 4 channel rca signal and use that as the sub signal
MTX Thunder elite ta7804
good:
huge power house.. i wish i still had this amp, traded it for the zeus back when i was a noob.
stable down to 1ohm a channel. the bass changes the colors.
nice crossover.
felt solid,
bad:
big amp, terminals are dificult to use.
alpine mrp-f300
good:
small design, its sleek. nice styling.
bad:
endcaps are cheap.
barely does rated.
wouldnt reccomend.
audioque 1200d:
good: simple design, small size big power.
stable down to .5 ohm. minor voltage hog.
bad:
not much to say. could be a little more efficient.
us acoustics usx 600f
good:
low THD, built in fan. solid amp, ZED designed. sound is very clear
stable down to 1ohm per channel. easily a 800-1k amp.
bad:
not very efficient, class a/b, lack of a nice crossover.
rockford fosgate power elite t500-2
good: big power. this was one of RF's most under rated lines of amps. usually 35-55%..theyve stated it themselves. lots of power. solid amp.
bad:
voltage hog, common ground failing. covers frequently lost. doesnt sound that good on speakers, more for subs. overly punchy, and not very soft sounding.
DD m3a
good: puts out massive power. looks hot. nice layout,
not to big, built solid. stable down to bad:
nothing to say at this time.
mb quart ONYX 1500.1
good: puts out nearly rated. attractive, and simple. i liked the amp,
used it in a friends install.
cons: voltage hog. gets hot. plastic on it feels cheap. gets the job done though.
more amps will be added as i think of amps ive used. otherwise its your turn to write your opinions!
tell your story here.
i was thinking about this, and thought people should post their opinions on amps in here!
we all research amps, but we want personal hand held review.
so ill lay down mine, and hope you all add!
Zapco ref 360.2
good:
small size, nice crossover, crisp sound,
would recommend. not heavily underated.
bad:
terminals are the lame Phillips head
hifonics zeus zxi60.4 + 1k
good:
it felt really solid, looked nice, put out the power.
does rated plus 5%-10%
bad:
lame plastic mounting terminals
it gets real hot
Memphis big belle
good: attractive.
built solid. sounded pretty well. does rated.
bad:
end caps are hard to find.
angled terminals arent the best.
to use all 5 channels you either have to use 1 rca for the sub amp,
or it will process the 4 channel rca signal and use that as the sub signal
MTX Thunder elite ta7804
good:
huge power house.. i wish i still had this amp, traded it for the zeus back when i was a noob.
stable down to 1ohm a channel. the bass changes the colors.
nice crossover.
felt solid,
bad:
big amp, terminals are dificult to use.
alpine mrp-f300
good:
small design, its sleek. nice styling.
bad:
endcaps are cheap.
barely does rated.
wouldnt reccomend.
audioque 1200d:
good: simple design, small size big power.
stable down to .5 ohm. minor voltage hog.
bad:
not much to say. could be a little more efficient.
us acoustics usx 600f
good:
low THD, built in fan. solid amp, ZED designed. sound is very clear
stable down to 1ohm per channel. easily a 800-1k amp.
bad:
not very efficient, class a/b, lack of a nice crossover.
rockford fosgate power elite t500-2
good: big power. this was one of RF's most under rated lines of amps. usually 35-55%..theyve stated it themselves. lots of power. solid amp.
bad:
voltage hog, common ground failing. covers frequently lost. doesnt sound that good on speakers, more for subs. overly punchy, and not very soft sounding.
DD m3a
good: puts out massive power. looks hot. nice layout,
not to big, built solid. stable down to bad:
nothing to say at this time.
mb quart ONYX 1500.1
good: puts out nearly rated. attractive, and simple. i liked the amp,
used it in a friends install.
cons: voltage hog. gets hot. plastic on it feels cheap. gets the job done though.
more amps will be added as i think of amps ive used. otherwise its your turn to write your opinions!
