Fuc!&%'n Mustang drivers!

Status
Not open for further replies.

BOXSTERSGUY
10+ year member

Member
Why is it every (most) tiredass,played out,mass produced,ancient technology,HAF(heavy as FUK),ugly,non sporty,Mustang always wants to race?is it they are trying to prove their car is still running so they rev the engine loudly at the stoplight?I'm fukin' sick of it,You know how many Gt's I tore the shit out of,its fukin' funny all that v-8 noise and no go!and not to mention the handling, You'd think Ford would of figured that shit out by now,its a fukkin' brick on wheels. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/furious.gif.fc81ca146dbff91fede3ed290dbc4f4c.gif

 
yea f*** a mustang... nothin but a cheap piece of trash and some chick with a dick said that a wanna be cool guy should buy it, so he did... i'll never let a mustang or a rice burner over in front of me... they are just as bad.

 
You drive a f u c k i n g porsche! Don't rip on the mustang drivers just because they are not rich enough to drive a car like yours
Although I agree that Mustangs arent all that special, this man speaks the truth.

And you should have saved up a some more for a Carrera, Boxsters are a poor mans porsche //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Thanx Gauntlet, i knew somebody would back me up. I'm not a Mustang person either, or a Ford person for that matter. I just hate it when people rip on others for their cars just because that is all that person can afford. True statement about porsches too. I see them all at a country club and all of the real car enthusiasts have carreras or 911s.

 
Well I don't remember where in my post I said anything about driving a stang cuz they can't afford better,you fukken idiots read into that yourselves-as far as Carrera it is a rear wheel drive car not mid-engine and if you knew any fukken thing about anything you would know that the first Porsche was a Mid-engine roadster known as the 356,so before you talk out your *** get some facts,my post had nothing to do with being rich or piss poor.

 
My 85 firebird with a 2.8L V6 kicked the a$$ off of a 87 mustang 5.0.

I bet the guy $100 for a three block race (approx 1/4 mile measured) and my car was at the end waiting for his sorry a$$ - best $100 I ever made.

Mustang has been fords attempt to match GM's Camaro and Firebird since the Mid 70's. They have yet to build a better car.

P.S. and a T/A is just a souped up Firebird

P.P.S. The 944's are rear wheel drive and have a front mounted engine, but a heavy rear mounted trany to end up with a 50/50 weight distribution

 
And you should have saved up a some more for a Carrera, Boxsters are a poor mans porsche //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif [/b]
Carrera and Boxster are two different cars with different purposes. Ones a 4 passenger GT and the other a 2 seat roadster. And the definition of poor sure has changed considering Boxsters range from 45-60k //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/greedy.gif.5a53e6246569d7ab79867170f3b06629.gif I wonder if the Maranello and GT guys call the Modena a poor mans Ferrari. I want to be a poor man!

 
Originally posted by Jmac Uhh, the only Porsches now that are rear wheel drive are the Boxsters, GT2, GT3, and Carrera GT ...

 

All the rest of them have all wheel drive ...

 

And all the 911s are rear engine, not mid engine ... The Boxsters and the Carrera GT are the only mid engine Porsches ...
-------------------------------

My Bad I meant rear engine:eek:

 
Originally posted by Jmac Uhh, the only Porsches now that are rear wheel drive are the Boxsters, GT2, GT3, and Carrera GT ...

 

All the rest of them have all wheel drive ...
 

 

Actually, the C2 and Targa are rear wheel drive. The C4, C4S, and Turbo, as you probably already knew, are all wheel.

 
i would have to disagree with most of you there. yes, i do agree though that there are a lot of mustangs out there, and while ford isn't a top quality company, i really don't think any of you have the right to ***** about considering i bet none of you have ever owned a ford. mustangs really don't ****, it's the people that drive them, they think that now that they have a mustang that they are going to win every race and therefore are really cocky. obviously, i own a mustang. while i admit it isn't the best car out there, i do know that i have one the fastest if not the fastest car at my school, the next closest would be a turbo shadow running about 21psi. the only real problem with fords is that they have a problem with rushing them out and into production, hence the focus haveing something like 6 recalls, like the rear wheels falling off, and the mustang II having a horrible *****. now, the reason i bought my stang, was becuase at the time, all i wanted was something with a big engine that i could sup up later. my car is crap, and i do admit that, unfortunately it was abused, a lot. so i don't have any working air conditioning, the windows don't roll down, there's no weatherstripping, none of the gauges work properly, etc. etc. etc. but for the money, i still believe that a 79-93 mustang is one of the best drag cars for the money. those years of stang have the most aftermarket performance parts available in the world! i mean, if you want a more luxurious car, sure, you can spend the 150g's on a ferrari, but if you want to drag, then you can always pick up a $4000 1988 stang(LX of course, less weight) and drop $20,000 into it, you could very easily have a 10 sec. car:)

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

BOXSTERSGUY

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
BOXSTERSGUY
Joined
Location
Orange County
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
70
Views
2,219
Last reply date
Last reply from
mattf
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top