Friends of companies and members of teams

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fair enough, but again, I have proved I am not on the team, I have met every rule that you say makes me able to post a 3rd party review of this company seeing as I am not affiliated with them. I have also proven that you said in theory I should be able to post that review again. So, what I am getting at is, am I able to post that review now?
Bro, this is coming from a complete third party to this fight, and I am not taking anyone's side. I am simply offering advice: cool down and stop pressing it for now. Let the mods look at the evidence of you not being affiliated with said company any longer. Pushing them does nothing but agitate them and may illicit actions taken against you, whether warranted or not. Again, I am not saying who is right or wrong, simply saying I've seen what happens when people push the people with power. You have made your case, give them an opportunity now, while you are ahead.

 

---------- Post added at 09:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:20 AM ----------

 

Too bad Geoff isn't in the group lol
True, but he broke caraudio's rules by posting member private information.

 
Fair enough, but again, I have proved I am not on the team, I have met every rule that you say makes me able to post a 3rd party review of this company seeing as I am not affiliated with them. I have also proven that you said in theory I should be able to post that review again. So, what I am getting at is, am I able to post that review now?
I don't think you understand the word "theory" at all. That does not mean yes or no. It is no more then a "maybe". You are basing your argument on a "maybe" statement I made. You are trying to pick this apart and it won't work. In the end, it is this Dragon made a decision and that was that. I don't see a reason to over turn it exactly it is a giant grey area in the rules and the decision can indeed go any way on that, he made a decision that he felt was best and after reading that thread I concluded that it was not a wrong decision based on that particular situation at hand.

 
Not a group, that is my own timeline that it was posted on. 

---------- Post added at 10:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 AM ----------

 

baaaazzzzzziiiiinnnnnggaaaaaaaa
Ill post the same question to you that you did to me when I ignored your circular arguments. Which one are you? A liar or affiliate of the company your trying to advertise for?

 
Not a group, that is my own timeline that it was posted on. 

---------- Post added at 10:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 AM ----------

 

baaaazzzzzziiiiinnnnnggaaaaaaaa
I just noticed that, I forgot you were removed from that group some time ago. You are still not allowed to post personal facebook info here though. Well you can about yourself, but not anyone else of course.

 
I don't think you understand the word "theory" at all. That does not mean yes or no. It is no more then a "maybe". You are basing your argument on a "maybe" statement I made. You are trying to pick this apart and it won't work. In the end, it is this Dragon made a decision and that was that. I don't see a reason to over turn it exactly it is a giant grey area in the rules and the decision can indeed go any way on that, he made a decision that he felt was best and after reading that thread I concluded that it was not a wrong decision based on that particular situation at hand.
I understand the word theory entirely. You are just using this "united front" idea to come across as a force to be reckoned with. You are persecuting somebody in an attempt to make an example of them. Can you tell me specifically after providing the proof being asked for, what rules I am breaking by wanting to post a 3rd party review of a product?

 
Ill post the same question to you that you did to me when I ignored your circular arguments. Which one are you? A liar or affiliate of the company your trying to advertise for?
I'm an avid fan who is not a part of team PHD. Your poor logic is blinding you my friend there are more options than the incriminating ones you provided.

 
I understand the word theory entirely. You are just using this "united front" idea to come across as a force to be reckoned with. You are persecuting somebody in an attempt to make an example of them. Can you tell me specifically after providing the proof being asked for, what rules I am breaking by wanting to post a 3rd party review of a product?
Rules they made up in their own heads cuz they don't like you. DUH.

 
Bro, this is coming from a complete third party to this fight, and I am not taking anyone's side. I am simply offering advice: cool down and stop pressing it for now. Let the mods look at the evidence of you not being affiliated with said company any longer. Pushing them does nothing but agitate them and may illicit actions taken against you, whether warranted or not. Again, I am not saying who is right or wrong, simply saying I've seen what happens when people push the people with power. You have made your case, give them an opportunity now, while you are ahead. 

---------- Post added at 09:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:20 AM ----------

 

True, but he broke caraudio's rules by posting member private information.
I appreciate your opinion and insight. I would kindly do that, but I know for a fact most of the moderation staff here is too hard-headed to ever back down from a decision, you should know that by now as well.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Ge_off_me

5,000+ posts
Parts Express Specialist
Thread starter
Ge_off_me
Joined
Location
Enon, Ohio
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
212
Views
3,010
Last reply date
Last reply from
whitedragon551
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top