Friends of companies and members of teams

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote name='wickedwitt']I knew you weren't going to change their minds, hence why I gave the opinion I did.

@kat_black181 Nice xmas pic girly[/QUOTE]

I know I will not be able to post it, I knew this from the get go, but I am bringing an issue to light.
 
[quote name='wickedwitt']I knew you weren't going to change their minds, hence why I gave the opinion I did.

@kat_black181 Nice xmas pic girly[/QUOTE]

Which one, hun?? FB one?? & Thank you!!! :)

---------- Post added at 10:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 AM ----------

[quote name='falcons03079313']yeah i know im good looking. what of it????[/QUOTE]

;-)
 
Nope, not at all. You are trying to nit pick through this. I already told you, what is done is done and pushing won't change that.
I'm aware that your ruling won't change. I'm honestly just showing how corrupt your guys' decision is. I've followed all of your rules aside from the private information deal, which I apologize for since it was your information.

 
I'm aware that your ruling won't change. I'm honestly just showing how corrupt your guys' decision is. I've followed all of your rules aside from the private information deal, which I apologize for since it was your information.
I understand what you think, but from what I read I didn't see any "corrupt" decision made. It may have been hasty I suppose but based on what I read in that thread it could have went any direction. He choose to lock/delete it. I don't disagree with that. If he would have choose not to do so, i wouldn't have disagreed with that choice. It was his choice to make, just like various other issues here were the moderating staff have to make a choice based on their views of the rules and how they apply to that particular situation.

 
I'm aware that your ruling won't change. I'm honestly just showing how corrupt your guys' decision is. I've followed all of your rules aside from the private information deal, which I apologize for since it was your information.
You didnt show anything or prove anything at all.

Facts:

  • You are on Team PHD.
  • You posted a review for a PHD product which you benefit from
  • PHD is not a vendor
  • You are advertising without a vendor subscription
  • Consequent review used to advertise without a vendor subscription was deleted
  • You got butt hurt and tried to push the envelope
  • While butt hurt you tried a circular argument that made yourself look ignorant
  • Now you try to deflect and say that your goal was to show corruption when infact it was for personal gain trying to advertise for a company you represent in competition

 
I understand what you think, but from what I read I didn't see any "corrupt" decision made. It may have been hasty I suppose but based on what I read in that thread it could have went any direction. He choose to lock/delete it. I don't disagree with that. If he would have choose not to do so, i wouldn't have disagreed with that choice. It was his choice to make, just like various other issues here were the moderating staff have to make a choice based on their views of the rules and how they apply to that particular situation.
Unlocking the first thread so I can take screen shots of it and show the original conversation? I will even edit out the review. I just want to show what actually happened in that thread. Even if you want to do it, that is fine. Hasty is absolutely correct. For what reason would he do such a thing? It could have to do with how I called him out for insulting the company he has never heard of before. I would just like to see what other's thought when they see the original thread.

 
Unlocking the first thread so I can take screen shots of it and show the original conversation? I will even edit out the review. I just want to show what actually happened in that thread. Even if you want to do it, that is fine. Hasty is absolutely correct. For what reason would he do such a thing? It could have to do with how I called him out for insulting the company he has never heard of before. I would just like to see what other's thought when they see the original thread.
No need to unlock the thread.

You posted a review for a companies product you rep in the lanes. I said they looked cheaply made. Mids look like PA drivers with a cheap cone and surround and tweeters look like garbage with a plastic grill. For $800 Id expect a speaker that doesnt look like it walked out of a dollar store. You got butt hurt. I mentioned to another member that it was a marketing ploy considering your on the companies team for which you posted the review, you agreed it was a marketing ploy. When you agreed it was a marketing ploy said thread was deleted.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Ge_off_me

5,000+ posts
Parts Express Specialist
Thread starter
Ge_off_me
Joined
Location
Enon, Ohio
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
212
Views
2,999
Last reply date
Last reply from
whitedragon551
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top