i think it's funny we got to the point where a 4cyl doing 0-60 in 6sec or less isn't impressive but is even called slow., 1985 corvette 350 did it in 8.5 seconds, my supercharged v6 gp does 6 sec and that was fast 13 yrs ago, even the gto at the time was only 1 second faster..
you are a vap. lol NO one wants to see a pic of any of your **** we know better..
dude it weighs over 4000 pounds, with auto 5speed.. i watched a show where they re did a camaro like 88 or so they tested 1st it did 0-60 in 14 seconds, that was the cars we were told were fast, now a tiny 4cyl blows all those old sports cars away when we woulda been happy it they did 8.5 seconds 20 yrs ago..
if you had half a brain in 1988 they where getting 800hp out of a 2.8 v12. we built rockets to the moon 20 years earlier. lol. the ripped people off for years and still are with there slow *** cars.
we don't respond to members of ISIS or who ever u are with...
20 years ago refers to 1997 error. so yea mid to late 90s
Since you are too stupid to read the 70s and early 80 "MOST" production where pretty slow cars. if you would read he said "we where told those cars where fast" Those being the cars of the 70s and 80s
ferrari's are fast and are JUNK. i know people who have owned them and one who does own one. driver them hard you better have them tuned up every 3k or they start giving you problems. granted they are a race car of sorts they aren't reliable daily drivers..
it was mine wasn't it.. admit it..
