Nobody is mad but you... as one can tell from your language. There is only one way to read the graph. My post included that information. What you ask for is already there.
You're resorting to name calling because you have lost. I provided that information. Had you read and been able to comprehend you would know that.
They didn't. They had everything there... but you already know this. That's why you're lying. Just like a true liberal you will lie even when the proof is just a few posts back.... hoping that anyone else reading this will miss it.
Yeah... it is. Quality over quantity is what matters in any scenario.
This is validated. They looked at the numbers in relation to what happened at the time and tell you exactly how it happened etc. fdr's own treasury secretary validates the point. You both ignored that and tried to lie and say i said nothing because what I did say proves you wrong. You cannot discredit the source. (a simply google search will yield many) You cannot discredit what those sources say. They discredit you... so you are attempting to discredit me. Stick to the facts. When you liberals go after the actual person, everyone else can see you have lost the debate.
I provided all you need and I'm not defensive. You're attacking me and calling me names. Clearly you are defensive. Until you can use some logic to show how my post was wrong, YOU are wrong. Since you can't and you've resorted to attacking me, you have lost and there is no way out of it.
All I see is, "You're a deceitful liberal. Everyone needs to hate you. I'm not going to take the time to search Google to provide the evidence I keep claiming is there. I didn't do what you said. You did what you said. I'm still not going to show everyone here how I'm right. I'm just going to keep saying you're evil so I win the argument."
I'm not lying about anything. No one thinks you're right just because you keep calling us all wrong. And again, you have failed to prove your argument. As this argument keeps going, you just keep getting more personal. Yes, I'm a liberal. No, I'm not trying to take advantage of everyone. Unlike you, I am arguing in the hope that everyone will re-read through the topic and see how radical and stupid your ideas are. I'm calling you names because you're calling me names, only you hide the names in several ambiguous sentences, hoping that people don't see them.
With a simple Google search, I can see that Abraham Lincoln ***** his mother. With a simple Google search, I can find that Barack Obama killed three hookers at the age of twelve. My point is, even people working/studying at universities have radical, illogical, moronic ideas. Writers must have authority or validation to prove their point, unless they just write to herd the sheep(you). You can keep going on about how I'm the devil, how I'm wrong and you're right, but until you PROVE your point rather than telling everyone else to go do it for you, I stand by everything I've said.
I'm not interested in your argument with Proximity, so I'm coming into this at an unbiased standpoint. I don't care about FDR or deficits in the '30s. I just see that he has posted numbers and statistical proof(or so he says) validating his claim. You've showed one article containing two people discussing numbers and interpreting them in a way that makes sense to them. Your argument can't be, "These two people are smarter than you. Listen to them." After the article, you argued that we're manipulative liars. That doesn't help your argument. I'm trying to ask you to prove your point, and you aren't.
