Hi there. I have a double degree in Computer Science and Philosophy. Meaning, I have a degree in analyizing statements and arguing. It's Easter sunday, however, so I'm in a good mood. I'll go ahead and give you a free class on why you're wrong:
Why El Ropo is a retard 101
I read that perfectly, and my response was exactly the point I was trying to make. The Kappa Perfects are the only infinity comps worth listening to, and you didn't get them, you got the kappas. Understand now?
Oh really?? lets go back to the statement you're referring to and analyze it.
Hahah, you are so delusional.
Kappa perfects are decent, but for the money you could of gotten some really nice comps instead. I'm sorry you settled for less. BTW, I never mentioned JL, and don't car for JL products myself.
Edit: Check out my cool new sig line!
Let's go with the first part: "Kappa perfects are decent"
I made no reference to actually spending money on Perfects. I specifically said I bought the kappas. I also have the kappas (not the perfects) in my sig.
Perhaps you would say that the reason you menitoned them is because they are actually the only "ok" comp that Inifinity puts out (in your mind, of course). If that were true, that would contradict the next part of your statement:
"but for the money you could of gotten some really nice comps instead."
Again,
I did not buy the perfects so, "for the money" has no bearing to anything that I did say, or anything that we are discussing. That part of your statement is set up only if the first part of your statement is true. Therefore, you are saying one of two things.
Either:
"You bought the kappa perfects, which are ok, but you could have spent the money that you used PURCHASING the kappa perfects on something else.
or
"Kappa perfects aren't bad, but you could buy better things with the money"
The first statement applies to the discussion going on (albeit incorrectly on your part)
The second statement is just a satelitte fact that has little to nothing to do with actual facts and states of the situation being discussed (i.e., you might as well have said "I like puddin pops, but ice cream would be a better value")
Whatever, you're just pissed because you think I dissed your beloved infinity speakers, and are being a compete infant about it.
This statement has no value whatsoever. You completely ignore all of the relevant information that I point out and reduce yourself to name calling... which is precisely what you are saying I did... acting immature about it.
Therefore, your statement is useless and hypocritical.
Just the fact that you bought 6x9s period proves my point. But then you add that you believe they will provide you with great SQ is hilarious. Oh, and yes, you could of saved the money you spent on the 6x9s, and gotten some kappa perfects, or some other nice sounding comps for the front. This is going to be hard for you to believe, but a great set of front comps and a sub stage will blow away a setup with poor sounding comps in front, 6x9's in the back and a substage. I'm not the only one on this thread who has touched on this fact.
First of all, Great != nice. Did I say they would give me
great SQ? no. Did I say they would replace a sub? no. Did I say they would give me a nice SQ alternative while I'm waiting for a sub? yes.
This also will be the
THIRD FUCKING TIME that I point out that I
DO NOT YET HAVE SUBS. Agian. Front stage + back stage (of any type) is STILL better than just a front stage.
Your entire argument on my point is completely and utterly invalid. Agian. For the third time.
What can you do now?? Walk away. Why? You are wrong. You have been wrong this entire thread. Every post you make to try to save face, only puts you further behind. You are not going to out argue me. Ever. If I am wrong, I will admit it and move on with my life... but if I know I'm right.. and I am here... I will win any argument against you.
Walk away
Gotta go to church now... byebye kids.