Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Did I just get OWNED???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phrozt" data-source="post: 1675846" data-attributes="member: 567069"><p>Hi there. I have a double degree in Computer Science and Philosophy. Meaning, I have a degree in analyizing statements and arguing. It's Easter sunday, however, so I'm in a good mood. I'll go ahead and give you a free class on why you're wrong:</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: Red"><strong>Why El Ropo is a retard 101</strong></span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh really?? lets go back to the statement you're referring to and analyze it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Let's go with the first part: "Kappa perfects are decent"</p><p></p><p>I made no reference to actually spending money on Perfects. I specifically said I bought the kappas. I also have the kappas (not the perfects) in my sig.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps you would say that the reason you menitoned them is because they are actually the only "ok" comp that Inifinity puts out (in your mind, of course). If that were true, that would contradict the next part of your statement:</p><p></p><p>"but for the money you could of gotten some really nice comps instead."</p><p></p><p>Again, <strong>I did not buy the perfects</strong> so, "for the money" has no bearing to anything that I did say, or anything that we are discussing. That part of your statement is set up only if the first part of your statement is true. Therefore, you are saying one of two things.</p><p></p><p>Either:</p><p></p><p>"You bought the kappa perfects, which are ok, but you could have spent the money that you used PURCHASING the kappa perfects on something else.</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>"Kappa perfects aren't bad, but you could buy better things with the money"</p><p></p><p>The first statement applies to the discussion going on (albeit incorrectly on your part)</p><p></p><p>The second statement is just a satelitte fact that has little to nothing to do with actual facts and states of the situation being discussed (i.e., you might as well have said "I like puddin pops, but ice cream would be a better value")</p><p></p><p></p><p>This statement has no value whatsoever. You completely ignore all of the relevant information that I point out and reduce yourself to name calling... which is precisely what you are saying I did... acting immature about it.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, your statement is useless and hypocritical.</p><p></p><p></p><p>First of all, Great != nice. Did I say they would give me <strong>great</strong> SQ? no. Did I say they would replace a sub? no. Did I say they would give me a nice SQ alternative while I'm waiting for a sub? yes.</p><p></p><p>This also will be the <strong>THIRD FU</strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10px">C</span></strong><strong>KING TIME</strong> that I point out that I <strong>DO NOT YET HAVE SUBS</strong>. Agian. Front stage + back stage (of any type) is STILL better than just a front stage.</p><p></p><p>Your entire argument on my point is completely and utterly invalid. Agian. For the third time.</p><p></p><p>What can you do now?? Walk away. Why? You are wrong. You have been wrong this entire thread. Every post you make to try to save face, only puts you further behind. You are not going to out argue me. Ever. If I am wrong, I will admit it and move on with my life... but if I know I'm right.. and I am here... I will win any argument against you.</p><p></p><p>Walk away</p><p></p><p>Gotta go to church now... byebye kids.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phrozt, post: 1675846, member: 567069"] Hi there. I have a double degree in Computer Science and Philosophy. Meaning, I have a degree in analyizing statements and arguing. It's Easter sunday, however, so I'm in a good mood. I'll go ahead and give you a free class on why you're wrong: [SIZE=18px][COLOR=Red][B]Why El Ropo is a retard 101[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] Oh really?? lets go back to the statement you're referring to and analyze it. Let's go with the first part: "Kappa perfects are decent" I made no reference to actually spending money on Perfects. I specifically said I bought the kappas. I also have the kappas (not the perfects) in my sig. Perhaps you would say that the reason you menitoned them is because they are actually the only "ok" comp that Inifinity puts out (in your mind, of course). If that were true, that would contradict the next part of your statement: "but for the money you could of gotten some really nice comps instead." Again, [B]I did not buy the perfects[/B] so, "for the money" has no bearing to anything that I did say, or anything that we are discussing. That part of your statement is set up only if the first part of your statement is true. Therefore, you are saying one of two things. Either: "You bought the kappa perfects, which are ok, but you could have spent the money that you used PURCHASING the kappa perfects on something else. or "Kappa perfects aren't bad, but you could buy better things with the money" The first statement applies to the discussion going on (albeit incorrectly on your part) The second statement is just a satelitte fact that has little to nothing to do with actual facts and states of the situation being discussed (i.e., you might as well have said "I like puddin pops, but ice cream would be a better value") This statement has no value whatsoever. You completely ignore all of the relevant information that I point out and reduce yourself to name calling... which is precisely what you are saying I did... acting immature about it. Therefore, your statement is useless and hypocritical. First of all, Great != nice. Did I say they would give me [B]great[/B] SQ? no. Did I say they would replace a sub? no. Did I say they would give me a nice SQ alternative while I'm waiting for a sub? yes. This also will be the [B]THIRD FU[/B][B][SIZE=10px]C[/SIZE][/B][B]KING TIME[/B] that I point out that I [B]DO NOT YET HAVE SUBS[/B]. Agian. Front stage + back stage (of any type) is STILL better than just a front stage. Your entire argument on my point is completely and utterly invalid. Agian. For the third time. What can you do now?? Walk away. Why? You are wrong. You have been wrong this entire thread. Every post you make to try to save face, only puts you further behind. You are not going to out argue me. Ever. If I am wrong, I will admit it and move on with my life... but if I know I'm right.. and I am here... I will win any argument against you. Walk away Gotta go to church now... byebye kids. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Did I just get OWNED???
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list