Dammit to hell........

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

Murder and a policeman defining probable cause are on completely opposite sides of the legal spectrum. I see now that you don't understand. Never mind me.

Illegal search is illegal

 

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

Murder and a policeman defining probable cause are on completely opposite sides of the legal spectrum. I see now that you don't understand. Never mind me.

Illegal search is illegal

 

[cyn 10+ year member]

You totally fell for it bro. I woulda called his bluff and said ok, go get a warrant then I will get out of my car, and wait out here with you.
He cant just go to a judge and get a warrant to search you for no reason

I don't know if you were "resisting" or not but denying a search is 100% LEGAL if you are not doing anything wrong

actually in this state they just have to call it in and get it with no issue... remember not every state is the same on the search warrants

 

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

actually in this state they just have to call it in and get it with no issue... remember not every state is the same on the search warrants

Got me there!

 

[MisterDeadeye 10+ year member]

Illegal search is illegal

You're retarded. They cant legally search your vehicle unless they either have your consent, probable cause, or a warrant. If they have any of those, the entire vehicle is fair game, locked compartments or not. The legality of the search has only to do with "probable cause" which is flexible. If the policeman truly thinks you have an illegal weapon or drugs in a package IN YOUR VEHICLE, they can take it and open it.

You're right about being able to not give consent for a search. If they have probable cause, they no longer have to ask you. If taken to court, the policeman would have to give his definition of probable cause, and if the court agrees, your appeal would be thrown out.

 

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

If they have any of those, the entire vehicle is fair game, locked compartments or not.

This is where you are wrong. ONLY WITH A WARRANT CAN THIS PART HAPPEN

 

[MisterDeadeye 10+ year member]

This is where you are wrong. ONLY WITH A WARRANT CAN THIS PART HAPPEN

Carroll vs United States. Nothing you say has any validity without proof. Do you have a supreme court ruling that contradicts this one?

 

[Bettr n' Revrse 5,000+ posts]

Well.... Shit

 

[Louisiana_CRX 5,000+ posts]

Im just happy I didnt take another vacation

 

[Louisiana_CRX 5,000+ posts]

Im just happy I didnt take another vacation

 

[chillin 10+ year member]

So what sour deez is saying is if you put drugs in a package and address it to someone, you can drive around with it and the cops cant touch it, you can give it to the person whose name is on it and the cops can't touch it. So unless the cop is inside the house when the person opens their mail containing the drugs, everyone is safe? What a great loophole in the system //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[chillin 10+ year member]

dbl

 

[slammedincouch 10+ year member]

He ripped apart the package I was bringing to the post office to check contents and searched whole car...lucky my car was clean...

Next time put one of your little buddies in that package!

"come at me police officer bro"

 

[SourDeez 10+ year member]

So what sour deez is saying is if you put drugs in a package and address it to someone, you can drive around with it and the cops cant touch it, you can give it to the person whose name is on it and the cops can't touch it. So unless the cop is inside the house when the person opens their mail containing the drugs, everyone is safe? What a great loophole in the system //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Technically, yes. Although I don't know about the laws in Canada post.

 

---------- Post added at 02:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:01 PM ----------

 

Carroll vs United States. Nothing you say has any validity without proof. Do you have a supreme court ruling that contradicts this one?

I'm talking about a regular traffic stop.. Not a federal court indictment

 

[MisterDeadeye 10+ year member]

Technically, yes. Although I don't know about the laws in Canada post.

Nope. You're still wrong.

I'm talking about a regular traffic stop.. Not a federal court indictment

Apparently you don't know what Supreme Court rulings are. The case I'm referring to is outlining that policemen can search a vehicle without a warrant if they have a reason to believe there's something illegal inside.