Current events discussion

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I have called out trump for things like his massive failures on covid vaccines. You're still just being irrelevant, holding on to a bunch of delusions of what has and hasn't happened.

Except the COVID vaccine was wildly successful, your claims of 98% death rate were false, the scream of myocarditis killing everyone was a lie. NONE of the data on BILLIONS of vaccinations administered supports your claims.
Yet, you continue to repeat the disproved narrative like a ghost.

AI is taking over world industry, look at Nvidia stocks, small
Nuclear modular reactors for power supply for seemingly endless data centers. Wtf do you know about the history of computing?

I know enough that the first PC I owned was a punch card unit the size of a large home computer DESK.
What would you like to know about the history of computing, and how is it relevant to your AI panic?

Big tech is basically making terminators right now, irrelevant man! Wtf are you even saying? It's so ignorant. If you followed all the people who have massive control over many nations in the world, you'd know there's a massive push to merge human biology with ai systems. You're just too far behind and irrelevant so you call me horrible things when it's the ideas and people with those horrible ideas and actions that you support.

"Big tech" made terminators as soon as the first gun was introduced. Tell me how AI has ruined your life.
If anything, AI is a tool that could make you a productive and contributing member of society again.

The modern Democratic Party doesn't even represent the US population anymore, and trump used to be a democrat, but you're retarded so you can't see the Republican Party is at least still an American party filled with both democrats and republicans. You don't get that because you're stuck in the past, irrelevant

There are millions more registered Democrats than there are Republicans. So, there's that.
The Republican party is filled with Democrats? Interesting.

Do you consider a ******/pathological liar/convicted felon/racist a good figurehead for the Republican party, or could they have done better?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Except the COVID vaccine was wildly successful, your claims of 98% death rate were false, the scream of myocarditis killing everyone was a lie. NONE of the data on BILLIONS of vaccinations administered supports your claims.
Yet, you continue to repeat the disproved narrative like a ghost.

I know enough that the first PC I owned was a punch card unit the size of a large home computer DESK.
What would you like to know about the history of computing, and how is it relevant to your AI panic?

"Big tech" made terminators as soon as the first gun was introduced. Tell me how AI has ruined your life.
If anything, AI is a tool that could make you a productive and contributing member of society again.

There are millions more registered Democrats than there are Republicans. So, there's that.
The Republican party is filled with Democrats? Interesting.

Do you consider a ******/pathological liar/convicted felon/racist a good figurehead for the Republican party, or could they have done better?

Lol a bunch of irrelevant BS lolololol

How does he know this?:

Top virologist claims there's 'pandemics coming on Jan 21'

Dr Peter Hotez, who was a leading voice during the Covid pandemic, warned there were at least nine infectious diseases currently spreading that could cause another pandemic - in a plea to the Trump administration not to cut disease research funding.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Hmmmm....

Did Fauci Warn Trump in 2017 That a 'Surprise Outbreak' Was Coming?

Dr. Anthony Fauci has led the NIAID for more than three decades, advising five U.S. presidents on global health threats.

www.snopes.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Do you consider a ******/pathological liar/convicted felon/racist a good figurehead for the Republican party, or could they have done better?

The EJ Carroll case and fraud case are crap. And Trump was found guilty of ****** Abuse and not guilty of ****, which IMHO just demonstrates that the jury was dysfunctional, didn't believe EJ Carroll's claim, but wanted to find Trump guilty of something. We have a legal system looking for crap these cases or the Hunter Biden case instead of pursuing real issues, like why TF is DHS, FBI, etc working with tech platforms to restrict speech and push propaganda.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Hmmmm....

Did Fauci Warn Trump in 2017 That a 'Surprise Outbreak' Was Coming?

Dr. Anthony Fauci has led the NIAID for more than three decades, advising five U.S. presidents on global health threats.

www.snopes.com

My guess is this is just the "Boy that cried wolf" crowd crying wolf. Then they take credit when they get one right and ignore all the times they were wrong. Alex Jones operates in a similar fashion.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

My guess is this is just the "Boy that cried wolf" crowd crying wolf. Then they take credit when they get one right and ignore all the times they were wrong. Alex Jones operates in a similar fashion.

I don't think people listen to him enough to understand what he means by what he says. He is a showman sometimes, but Jones is really at the forefront of pointing out very complex and evil ordeals on a global scale that not really any other sizable news outlets come even close to:

"Comprehensive Biometric Scanning Systems Developed for Digital ID"

"The Indian biometric equipmentmanufacture BioEnable has received Modular Open Source Identity Platform (MOSIP) approval, according to Biometric Update on Wednesday. MOSIP is not-for-profit organization which helps governments conceive, develop and implement effective ‘digital public infrastructure’ in countries and is supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among others."

https://www.infowars.com/posts/comprehensive-biometric-scanning-systems-developed-for-digital-id

Just for Rob:

Are you ready for the Singularity?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Lol a bunch of irrelevant BS lolololol

BILLIONS of data points are "irrelevant BS", but your conspiracy theories that you got by "doing your own research", that collapse under the SIMPLEST scrutiny, is how you live life?
Interesting.

How does he know this?:

Top virologist claims there's 'pandemics coming on Jan 21'

Dr Peter Hotez, who was a leading voice during the Covid pandemic, warned there were at least nine infectious diseases currently spreading that could cause another pandemic - in a plea to the Trump administration not to cut disease research funding.

www.dailymail.co.uk

View attachment 61702

Hmmmm....

Did Fauci Warn Trump in 2017 That a 'Surprise Outbreak' Was Coming?

Dr. Anthony Fauci has led the NIAID for more than three decades, advising five U.S. presidents on global health threats.

www.snopes.com

He doesn't know it, he's predicting it.
Scientist are smart people and they use things like historical data plus current activity to predict the likelihood of things to come.
Do you think it's magic that a statistician can tell you that in 100 flips of a coin, you'll likely get heads 50% of the time?

From the link you shared:
"He continued: 'We have another major coronavirus likely brewing in Asia, we've had SARS-2 in 2002, Covid-19 in 2019, and we know these viruses are jumping from bats to people thousands of times a year.to people thousands of times a year.
'But there's still more. We know that we have a big problem with mosquito transmitted viruses all along the Gulf Coast where I am here in Texas, we're expecting Dengue and possibly Zika virus coming back or Oropuche virus, maybe even Yellow Fever.
'And then we have all this sharp rise in vaccine-preventable diseases going up because of, in part, the anti-vaccine activisim that's so prominent right now.
'We have a five-fold rise in pertussis cases, or whooping cough, over the last year, 15 measles outbreaks this year, we've got polio, that's been in the wastewater in New York state."

Do you think it's pure coincidence that the polio case in NY in 2022 happened to an unvaccinated kid?
Maybe the deep state gave it to him to continue the "fraud" that vaccines actually work?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

BILLIONS of data points are "irrelevant BS", but your conspiracy theories that you got by "doing your own research", that collapse under the SIMPLEST scrutiny, is how you live life?
Interesting.


He doesn't know it, he's predicting it.
Scientist are smart people and they use things like historical data plus current activity to predict the likelihood of things to come.
Do you think it's magic that a statistician can tell you that in 100 flips of a coin, you'll likely get heads 50% of the time?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Scientific THEORY is what then? Sure science uses facts but they also GUESS a whole lot.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Rob, you already know what I think. Why do you like to endlessly argue about the same shit over and over like it means anything? I'm sure you're typing up another long diarrhea post

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I can smell it through my screen Rob

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

The EJ Carroll case and fraud case are crap. And Trump was found guilty of ****** Abuse and not guilty of ****, which IMHO just demonstrates that the jury was dysfunctional, didn't believe EJ Carroll's claim, but wanted to find Trump guilty of something. We have a legal system looking for crap these cases or the Hunter Biden case instead of pursuing real issues, like why TF is DHS, FBI, etc working with tech platforms to restrict speech and push propaganda.

Why are they crap? Why would Trump's attorneys pick a "dysfunctional" jury?
The EJC's case against Trump was strong, his defense was crap, made even worse with his own self-admitted history. And then he decided to make it even worse by ignoring all opportunity to just shut his mouth for once.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Same with the financial fraud. He admits to doing something liek that on a massive scale, and he's ASKING for trouble. Don't brag if you don't want hassle, ESPECIALLY when you have happily and willingly made yourself the target of ire for so many people.
I do find it funny when people use the "no one was hurt" excuse for Trump, but conveniently forget it for Hunter.

I don't think the case against Hunter was "crap", other than the fact that it was treated like a much bigger deal simply because he was POTUS's son. It should have been prosecuted the same as any other case with similar charges.

Trump got off easy, TBH. Plenty of people doing jail time PLUS paying back money for financial crimes they committed that were of much less magnitude. I met a guy at a BCA conference last year who did 7 years in lockup plus has to pay back the money for a $2 million swindle.
Trump's was a few dollars more than that, and certainly a shit-ton more than Hunter's, yet people want to dismiss it as "bullshit", while simultaneously wanting to crush Hunter.

So, which one will it be? Crush them both, or ignore them both?
Or do we apply different rules for each, and WHY?

Scientific THEORY is what then? Sure science uses facts but they also GUESS a whole lot.

So you think that scientists gather data, do tests, analyze statistics, compare possibilities, and then simply GUESS at what might be right, or what might happen?

So when you phone was designed, they simply threw a bunch of parts together that they GUESSED might be right and might work together?
The engineers that designed your car simply GUESSED at what engine might work with what transmission, with what tires, and what gear ratio and what timing advance, with what compression ratio?
The doctor that did the surgery on your hand simply guess at how to do it, and what materials to use?

Wow. You are either really unaware of realities of life, our you're being deliberately obtuse to push a weird narrative.
Maybe check out the definition of "scientific theory" (the book one, not your "alternative/thinking out of the box" one that you'll likely come up with, now that you've been challenged.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob, you already know what I think. Why do you like to endlessly argue about the same shit over and over like it means anything? I'm sure you're typing up another long diarrhea post

If you're going to argue here that what you "think" is what determines reality, I have no discomfort calling bullshit on it. You certainly have no problem calling bullshit on actual facts that are posted here.

Do you think you are a special snowflake and should not be questioned for your bullshit, while you question reality?
Nope. You're not.

Post that you created a perpetual motion machine, and I'll throw the BS card.
Post again that you have been brought back from the dead, and I'll throw the BS card.
Tell me you wouldn't do the same if the roles were reversed.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Bama pardon this dude to become an activist?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Why are they crap? Why would Trump's attorneys pick a "dysfunctional" jury?
The EJC's case against Trump was strong, his defense was crap, made even worse with his own self-admitted history. And then he decided to make it even worse by ignoring all opportunity to just shut his mouth for once.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Same with the financial fraud. He admits to doing something liek that on a massive scale, and he's ASKING for trouble. Don't brag if you don't want hassle, ESPECIALLY when you have happily and willingly made yourself the target of ire for so many people.
I do find it funny when people use the "no one was hurt" excuse for Trump, but conveniently forget it for Hunter.

I don't think the case against Hunter was "crap", other than the fact that it was treated like a much bigger deal simply because he was POTUS's son. It should have been prosecuted the same as any other case with similar charges.

Trump got off easy, TBH. Plenty of people doing jail time PLUS paying back money for financial crimes they committed that were of much less magnitude. I met a guy at a BCA conference last year who did 7 years in lockup plus has to pay back the money for a $2 million swindle.
Trump's was a few dollars more than that, and certainly a shit-ton more than Hunter's, yet people want to dismiss it as "bullshit", while simultaneously wanting to crush Hunter.

So, which one will it be? Crush them both, or ignore them both?
Or do we apply different rules for each, and WHY?

It's pretty simple, we should try people for the crimes they commit instead of who they are. The Federal gov't isn't looking to jail everybody that's behind on taxes or answered no to drug use on their firearms application, when they were indeed using. NY isn't going after every developer in NY for "exaggerated" values on their loan applications and if they did I highly suspect RE development would grind to a halt. How many guys would be tried for defamation for denying they ***** somebody decades ago, then found not guilty of ****, but still have to pay $88m in damages to somebody with an estimated net worth of between $1-5m? The case is absolutely ludicrous. EJ Carroll is a misandrist, a nutcase and has less credibility than Cackling Kamala.

The only case they have against Trump that has merit is the Georgia tampering case, but Fani Willis is morally compromised. Once Trump leaves office, the true motive for the case is gone and the case will wither away on the vine. Oh wait, Trump will never leave office, Rachel Maddow told me so.