Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimi77" data-source="post: 8884984" data-attributes="member: 673702"><p>It's pretty simple, we should try people for the crimes they commit instead of who they are. The Federal gov't isn't looking to jail everybody that's behind on taxes or answered no to drug use on their firearms application, when they were indeed using. NY isn't going after every developer in NY for "exaggerated" values on their loan applications and if they did I highly suspect RE development would grind to a halt. How many guys would be tried for defamation for denying they ***** somebody decades ago, then found not guilty of ****, but still have to pay $88m in damages to somebody with an estimated net worth of between $1-5m? The case is absolutely ludicrous. EJ Carroll is a misandrist, a nutcase and has less credibility than Cackling Kamala.</p><p></p><p>The only case they have against Trump that has merit is the Georgia tampering case, but Fani Willis is morally compromised. Once Trump leaves office, the true motive for the case is gone and the case will wither away on the vine. Oh wait, Trump will never leave office, Rachel Maddow told me so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimi77, post: 8884984, member: 673702"] It's pretty simple, we should try people for the crimes they commit instead of who they are. The Federal gov't isn't looking to jail everybody that's behind on taxes or answered no to drug use on their firearms application, when they were indeed using. NY isn't going after every developer in NY for "exaggerated" values on their loan applications and if they did I highly suspect RE development would grind to a halt. How many guys would be tried for defamation for denying they ***** somebody decades ago, then found not guilty of ****, but still have to pay $88m in damages to somebody with an estimated net worth of between $1-5m? The case is absolutely ludicrous. EJ Carroll is a misandrist, a nutcase and has less credibility than Cackling Kamala. The only case they have against Trump that has merit is the Georgia tampering case, but Fani Willis is morally compromised. Once Trump leaves office, the true motive for the case is gone and the case will wither away on the vine. Oh wait, Trump will never leave office, Rachel Maddow told me so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Current events discussion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list