Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8884980" data-attributes="member: 683408">Why are they crap? Why would Trump&#039;s attorneys pick a &quot;dysfunctional&quot; jury?The EJC&#039;s case against Trump was strong, his defense was crap, made even worse with his own self-admitted history. And then he decided to make it even worse by ignoring all opportunity to just shut his mouth for once.Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.Same with the financial fraud. He admits to doing something liek that on a massive scale, and he&#039;s ASKING for trouble. Don&#039;t brag if you don&#039;t want hassle, ESPECIALLY when you have happily and willingly made yourself the target of ire for so many people.I do find it funny when people use the &quot;no one was hurt&quot; excuse for Trump, but conveniently forget it for Hunter.I don&#039;t think the case against Hunter was &quot;crap&quot;, other than the fact that it was treated like a much bigger deal simply because he was POTUS&#039;s son. It should have been prosecuted the same as any other case with similar charges.Trump got off easy, TBH. Plenty of people doing jail time PLUS paying back money for financial crimes they committed that were of much less magnitude. I met a guy at a BCA conference last year who did 7 years in lockup plus has to pay back the money for a $2 million swindle.Trump&#039;s was a few dollars more than that, and certainly a shit-ton more than Hunter&#039;s, yet people want to dismiss it as &quot;bullshit&quot;, while simultaneously wanting to crush Hunter.So, which one will it be? Crush them both, or ignore them both?Or do we apply different rules for each, and WHY?So you think that scientists gather data, do tests, analyze statistics, compare possibilities, and then simply GUESS at what might be right, or what might happen?So when you phone was designed, they simply threw a bunch of parts together that they GUESSED might be right and might work together?The engineers that designed your car simply GUESSED at what engine might work with what transmission, with what tires, and what gear ratio and what timing advance, with what compression ratio?The doctor that did the surgery on your hand simply guess at how to do it, and what materials to use?Wow. You are either really unaware of realities of life, our you&#039;re being deliberately obtuse to push a weird narrative.Maybe check out the definition of &quot;scientific theory&quot; (the book one, not your &quot;alternative/thinking out of the box&quot; one that you&#039;ll likely come up with, now that you&#039;ve been challenged.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8884980, member: 683408"] Why are they crap? Why would Trump's attorneys pick a "dysfunctional" jury? The EJC's case against Trump was strong, his defense was crap, made even worse with his own self-admitted history. And then he decided to make it even worse by ignoring all opportunity to just shut his mouth for once. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Same with the financial fraud. He admits to doing something liek that on a massive scale, and he's ASKING for trouble. Don't brag if you don't want hassle, ESPECIALLY when you have happily and willingly made yourself the target of ire for so many people. I do find it funny when people use the "no one was hurt" excuse for Trump, but conveniently forget it for Hunter. I don't think the case against Hunter was "crap", other than the fact that it was treated like a much bigger deal simply because he was POTUS's son. It should have been prosecuted the same as any other case with similar charges. Trump got off easy, TBH. Plenty of people doing jail time PLUS paying back money for financial crimes they committed that were of much less magnitude. I met a guy at a BCA conference last year who did 7 years in lockup plus has to pay back the money for a $2 million swindle. Trump's was a few dollars more than that, and certainly a shit-ton more than Hunter's, yet people want to dismiss it as "bullshit", while simultaneously wanting to crush Hunter. So, which one will it be? Crush them both, or ignore them both? Or do we apply different rules for each, and WHY? So you think that scientists gather data, do tests, analyze statistics, compare possibilities, and then simply GUESS at what might be right, or what might happen? So when you phone was designed, they simply threw a bunch of parts together that they GUESSED might be right and might work together? The engineers that designed your car simply GUESSED at what engine might work with what transmission, with what tires, and what gear ratio and what timing advance, with what compression ratio? The doctor that did the surgery on your hand simply guess at how to do it, and what materials to use? Wow. You are either really unaware of realities of life, our you're being deliberately obtuse to push a weird narrative. Maybe check out the definition of "scientific theory" (the book one, not your "alternative/thinking out of the box" one that you'll likely come up with, now that you've been challenged. [/QUOTE]

Verification