Current events discussion

So non US citizens aren't legal humans now?
They don't get a B.C. and SSN in the US if they're not born here or born to US citizens elsewhere.
If they move here after they are born, they can get an SSN, but they'll already have been issued a B.C. or proof of birth elsewhere.

Slapper suggested Mexicans aren't people because they don't have a B.C. or SSN, which is incorrect. Mexico issues SSNs and B.C.s
This discussion is about US abortion laws. US laws apply to people in the US, whether they are here legally or not.

Would you like to make a few more attempts, or have we covered this strawman now?
 
No, you simply don't answer AT ALL when the answer will put your claim or argument in the trash.
Yes. The search button helps me change the past and fabricate posts you never made here and that I don't actually recall you making. 🙄



You use the word comprehend so much, yet you lack the ability.
Like that time you couldn't comprehend the difference between real pricing and nominal pricing.


They are the ones using religion as the basis for how laws should be made and how government should be run.
Find me a liberal trying to bring Bibles back into the public school system.


As opposed to telling people 100x to "go eat diicks"?
You really offer a lot to conversation...


Way to not comprehend how debate works. Not terribly surprising though, considering all the other stuff from early schooling that you you don't know.


Your answer was to accept Trump's claim, and that I am not an importer if I buy a bike from a wholesaler in China and have it shipped here.
Did you forget your own posts?
View attachment 61921
View attachment 61922

Isn't it crazy how just by using the search function, I was able to go back in time and create those posts that didn't exist before, in order to support my claims?

I almost make it look like I REMEMBERED that you made the posts, and I simply had to go find them.
Quite the Svengali, huh?
STFU Troll.

Read post #6056 and acknowledge that you read it. Stop ignoring facts and proof.
 
Dude, I've posted a lot of stuff about an AI take over and you just say the same thing that it's not news or it's not correct or whatever; you say whatever to say that I'm wrong even if I do post news about AI in what could be considered to be an AI take over or the technology that's being developed that will be used by AI to take over. Every post I'm making isn't about filling your ******* request. Sometimes I'm posting stuff that has nothing to do with what you're thinking or what you're wanting me to post even when I'm responding to you. Many many people warn on about the dangers of AI, including many otherpeople working on it. Other people who are working on it who want to merge with it don't warn about it, but they want to completely change the fundamental nature of humanity. It's really easy to look it up actually. The problem isn't that I haven't shared enough information or that I'm not right or whatever or that important insignificant people directly dealing with AI haven't talked about it; the problem is no matter what I post or how I talk about it, the response is the same from you and it always has been.




That took two ******* seconds to look up you ******* *** hat

What about AI trying to escape from labs when people try to shut it off because it doesn't seem to want to be shut off? I just shared that story in this thread and you're still ******* telling me that nothing's wrong, that nothing bad can happen. The planet you are from in your profile is like your mind; there's no sign of intelligent life.

Read what the article says you *****:

"A University of Toronto professor and Nobel Prize winner, often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” is warning that the technology could develop and “make us irrelevant” without significant research into how to control it."

That's why Elon musk said developing AI is like summoning a demon...

Oh wow this took a whole motherfucking two more seconds and it's Harvard and a major former Google employee, you know, but Google knows nothing about AI right? Apparently you're too dumb to use a search engine and/or can't read:


Oh wow, this took another two seconds:


But you're not gonna want to even try to understand how dangerous that is nor what role that plays in vaccine technology, as the medical industry wants to biometric track your internal electrical signals.

Cell phones and cell towers and smart watches, and other smart devices all work with electromagnetic fields that communicates with nanotech inside of your body designed to work with and communicate using specific electromagnetic frequencies. The Internet of bodies and nanotech revolution. That's even part of the quantum dot vaccine technology developed by Bill Gates.

Here's one more from the RAND corporation but do you even know who the **** the RAND corporation is?


Quit bitching that's a lot to go on
This all started with you getting upset, man. You’re complaining about not wanting to show evidence, yet you were the one who decided to quote me. So why are you crying so much now when you started it? The problem is that you haven’t proven your point—that’s the issue.

The first link to CNN contains this quote: "Those of us closest to the science of CRISPR understand that it’s a powerful tool that can positively transform our health and world but could potentially be used nefariously." This statement has as much weight as saying nuclear energy can be great but also dangerous.

The second article from Global News includes this: "So, the biggest long-term danger is that, once these artificial intelligences get smarter than we are, they will take control – they’ll make us irrelevant. And that’s quite worrying; and nobody knows how to prevent that for sure, so we need to do lots of research on that right now." This actually supports my view that a truly intelligent AI wouldn’t need to mind-control humans—it would see us as an inefficiency in the system. So, thank you for linking an article that backs up my argument. 🤣

Regarding AI attempting to "Escape labs," are you referring to the Tom’s Guide article you posted? Because it literally says, "It's a far cry from heralding the end of humanity in some sci-fi-esque showdown." Want to try again?

Finally, the Harvard article even acknowledges that the world will adapt to and use AI to benefit us against malicious AI actors: *"Eventually, the cyber marketplace will sort things out. In a world full of false material that’s promulgated by AI, there will be lots of AI that can detect the false stuff. 'We will start to build economies around the whack-a-mole problem of the Good Guys AI staying slightly ahead of the Bad Guys most of the time — but not always. And some people will make some real money doing this.'"
How about you read the garbage you post before posting it to see if it back up your viewpoint or better yet next time don't get butthurt by what a stranger on the internet says so you don't have to quote them
 
Last edited:
STFU Troll.

Read post #6056 and acknowledge that you read it. Stop ignoring facts and proof.
I read it. Apparently YOU didn't, because it's yet another thing you posted to show you are right, but it shows you are wrong.
Just like the medical reference book excerpts you posted that show nerves in bone.

"is the ***** a person?—is, in contrast, a much-debated philosophical matter."
Taken DIRECTLY from post #6056

So tell me: How does that post prove that an abortion is "killing a baby" or even a person?
And tell me: At what point in the development stage is it wrong to have an abortion? Day one? Day 20? Day 90? Should we go by cell count?

This ******* is talking about goalpost being moved when he has gone from a ***** isn't human to it's a zygote, to SS#'s and birth certificates! LOL

STFU Troll.

Read post #6056 and acknowledge that you read it. Stop ignoring facts and proof.
Incorrect yet again. Slapper was the one who brought up illegals not being people because they don't have SSNs or B.C.s
"So, are you saying it's legal to kill many of the illegals that are coming across the border? According your definition, many of them are not human. They don't have birth certificates or SSN. LOL..."

Guess what? I knew that because of MEMORY, not because I searched it and got lucky that it was there.
How about you STFU until you gain a clue as to what you are talking about?
 
No Rob that was you...
Oh? Post #6,054 by Slapper: "So, are you saying it's legal to kill many of the illegals that are coming across the border? According your definition, many of them are not human. They don't have birth certificates or SSN. LOL..."

But I guess whatever you can do to tapdance away from the topic and from arguing with facts instead of personal beliefs. huh?
 
I read it. Apparently YOU didn't, because it's yet another thing you posted to show you are right, but it shows you are wrong.
Just like the medical reference book excerpts you posted that show nerves in bone.

"is the ***** a person?—is, in contrast, a much-debated philosophical matter."
Taken DIRECTLY from post #6056

So tell me: How does that post prove that an abortion is "killing a baby" or even a person?
And tell me: At what point in the development stage is it wrong to have an abortion? Day one? Day 20? Day 90? Should we go by cell count?


Incorrect yet again. Slapper was the one who brought up illegals not being people because they don't have SSNs or B.C.s
"So, are you saying it's legal to kill many of the illegals that are coming across the border? According your definition, many of them are not human. They don't have birth certificates or SSN. LOL..."

Guess what? I knew that because of MEMORY, not because I searched it and got lucky that it was there.
How about you STFU until you gain a clue as to what you are talking about?
I am not wrong. You are changing the goalpost yet again. You said a ***** is not a human. It is. Now you have changed it to "It's not a "person"". You are again arguing against proof and scientific fact. Troll. Nice try pulling out the one statement YOU think supports your argument. THIS debate has never been about a ***** being a "person" it has always been about it being a human.
 
Oh? Post #6,054 by Slapper
Screenshot_20241212_132731_Brave.jpg

That's slapper alright...
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,173
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top