Current events discussion

You certainly can, but using the search tool doesn't created results that didn't exist before. Again: Do you think I just get lucky and every time I look for something it happens to be there?
How could I possibly search for something unless I already knew it existed?
Like your claim that a house can't have "2.3 kids"? How could I possibly find that unelss I already knew you posted it?
Do you think I go back and read every post you've made, HOPING to find that info? HOPING that you may have mentioned it?
Do you think I go and read entire anatomy books after I say there are nerves in bones, AFTER I have said it, HOPING the info is out there?
I just get TOTALLY lucky to find that a federal law exists allowing Biden to sell oil from the SPR, after I argue against your claim that he broke the law?
Apply the slightest bit of logic to your argument, and it falls apart.
So because I didn't answer you stupid questions the way you wanted me to answer them you decided to post the same shit. Like I said, you have been using the search button since the first forum you got banned from. It's all you got. You are a dumb guy who trolls people and they relives the conversations over and over.
So you don't have your shit together? Must be the case if you think I don't, since we are BOTH here.
You are the only one trolling. Had you been gifted with even half a brain you could have comprehended that.
It sure can be.
And it's as irrelevant to the discussion as your statement that Democrats have religious beliefs.
Let me help you along. You love to insult right-wingers as if they are the only one's with religion.
Quite literally. Just make shit up and demand that people accept it as fact.
Trolling epitomized.
Yes, that is what a troll does, what you do.
So I am supposed to just accept lies as truth so that entitled snowflakes won't get sad that their BS is questioned, and not just accepted as fact because THEY said so?
No thanks.
I think the right-wingers use the phrase "**** your feelings", right?
Who gives a **** if you accept anything. I fully believe people lie to you constantly just to **** with you. Mom and Dad aren't dead, they just can't stand you. It's your burden that you have chosen to never believe anyone. You created that wall in your life. Your problem is you keep stacking bricks. Yes, **** your feelings. Your entitled feelings that everyone owes you a response.
Cool. Show me the post where you answered the question of who pays the import tariff for an item coming from China.
Show me the post where you answered the question of who pays the import tariff for the $888 bike being shipped to me from China.
A post number is fine. Screen cap works too, if you can do that.
Why, because you refused to accept it when I wrote it the past 4+ times? Use the ******* search button troll.
 
Repeating "I already did" does not change the fact that you didn't.


That's a really odd strawman. Why do you think Mexicans don't get birth certificates and SSNs when they are born? Do you think USA is the only country to issue such things? That's downright weird.

And it doesn't provide an example of a ***** that has been issued a birth certificate and an SSN.
You have to legally be a person to get those.
But go ahead and show me an example where it has happened.


And you demand others live by your beliefs. More specifically, your religious beliefs.


The story of creation. It's simply not possible that our entire existence is only 6,000 years old when they have physical specimens of humans that are carbon-dated at ~233,000 years old.
The story is a fairy tale, as are many other stories in it.
Try the great flood of Noah. Impossible, and striking similar to Gilgamesh.


Already showed it to you.
I never said enslave homosexuals. I said enslave the enemy. Deuteronomy 20.


I did no such thing.

A zygote is the UNION of the sperm and the egg.
There is no UNION if they are not TOGETHER. Let's try again:
zygote - a diploid cell resulting from the fusion of two haploid gametes; a fertilized ovum.
fusion - the process or result of joining two or more things together to form a single entity
diploid - a cell or organism that has two complete sets of chromosomes

Perhaps YOU need a refresher on English comprehension?


Embryos are formed by mitosis, not by cells "coming together".
They literally split to form new cells.
mitosis - a process of cell division that produces two identical daughter cells from a single parent cell
A ***** is formed by the process of mitosis; after fertilization, the zygote (a single cell formed by the fusion of sperm and egg) repeatedly divides through mitosis to create a multitude of cells, which eventually develop into an embryo and then a *****

Did you skip anatomy and physiology in high school?

Hahahaha. You identified a zygote incorrectly, and identified a dog ***** as human.


The law says a ***** is not legally a person. It is made of human cells, for sure, but not legally a person.
You said aborting a zygote is not "killing a baby". So, at what point of gestation does it become "a baby"?
Thx guesses it's between 8 and 9 weeks, but will not commit beyond that. How about you?


Oh? Over 1,000 wars were started due to Christianity. Ever hear of the Crusades?
Jesus said "“But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.”
Lets do the math on THAT.


You're parroting the AI result an awful lot. But the AI results are very often a "survey says" type of compendium.
if the "survey said" that the moon is bigger than the sun, would you accept it because the AI result told you so?

So can you show me a B.C. and an SSN issue to a *****, or not?
STFU Troll.

Read post #6056 and acknowledge that you read it. Stop ignoring facts and proof.
 
News flash: My beliefs are not used to shape US law. I do not force my beliefs on others. I do not expect people to live their lives based on my personal beliefs.
Can YOU say the same?
WTF are you talking about? We all force our personal beliefs on others in one or another. That's why govt's exist - to decide whose/which beliefs will be enforced, how they'll be enforced, etc.
 

This is why there's drones all over the news is because it's the US making threats to their enemies, that's a huge part of it in my opinion. It's a show of force, a show of technology for the world to see as war starts. All the drone shit is also a psychological operation for the normal people. The military knows exactly what they are because they made them. The mind games that are being played with the population are ******* ridiculous and pissing me off.

"Missile Strikes Deep into Russia a ‘Big Mistake’ says Trump"

 
Last edited:
You seem like a troll in a way. You seem smart but you're mixing and matching stuff altogether, you're attributing some things to what other people said in general and not directly me, and that leans towards the idea again you don't know what you're talking about or what I mean by certain issues. I get the deep feeling no matter what I post or don't you're gonna be the same way, because we fundamentally disagree on life. Fallback on "go do the research yourself"? Dude, I've probably posted more news and science and whatever articles on this site than probably any other person on the history of this entire site forever. I know you can't look it all up but ninja please.

So, there's just shit not adding up with your logic here and what you are and aren't attributing to me saying. You can't organize information like you have in that post and really have a meaningful conversation. What you're doing is throwing your opinion at me in a way it's impossible to respond.

I need evidence of what happens when you die, whether or not you live or not into something afterwards. If you don't live on after your body dies, I need proof. If you do live on after your body dies, I need proof. I'm asking you specifically since you want to say the things I'm talking about are dumb.
Ain’t that the pot calling the kettle black. The guy constantly shouting about an AI takeover is calling someone a troll for simply asking for evidence what a laugh. Once again, you accuse me of doing exactly what you’re doing. You claim random videos about drones are ‘news’? Seriously?

All I’ve done is ask for evidence probably for the 10th time now and instead of providing anything substantial, you’re melting down and acting like a kid throwing a tantrum because they didn’t get their way.

As for your last paragraph, it’s just another tangent. Instead of actually addressing the request for evidence, you veer off into unrelated territory. Stick to the point: show evidence or admit you don’t have it.
 
Ain’t that the pot calling the kettle black. The guy constantly shouting about an AI takeover is calling someone a troll for simply asking for evidence what a laugh. Once again, you accuse me of doing exactly what you’re doing. You claim random videos about drones are ‘news’? Seriously?

All I’ve done is ask for evidence probably for the 10th time now and instead of providing anything substantial, you’re melting down and acting like a kid throwing a tantrum because they didn’t get their way.

As for your last paragraph, it’s just another tangent. Instead of actually addressing the request for evidence, you veer off into unrelated territory. Stick to the point: show evidence or admit you don’t have it.

Dude, I've posted a lot of stuff about an AI take over and you just say the same thing that it's not news or it's not correct or whatever; you say whatever to say that I'm wrong even if I do post news about AI in what could be considered to be an AI take over or the technology that's being developed that will be used by AI to take over. Every post I'm making isn't about filling your ******* request. Sometimes I'm posting stuff that has nothing to do with what you're thinking or what you're wanting me to post even when I'm responding to you. Many many people warn on about the dangers of AI, including many otherpeople working on it. Other people who are working on it who want to merge with it don't warn about it, but they want to completely change the fundamental nature of humanity. It's really easy to look it up actually. The problem isn't that I haven't shared enough information or that I'm not right or whatever or that important insignificant people directly dealing with AI haven't talked about it; the problem is no matter what I post or how I talk about it, the response is the same from you and it always has been.




That took two ******* seconds to look up you ******* *** hat

What about AI trying to escape from labs when people try to shut it off because it doesn't seem to want to be shut off? I just shared that story in this thread and you're still ******* telling me that nothing's wrong, that nothing bad can happen. The planet you are from in your profile is like your mind; there's no sign of intelligent life.

Read what the article says you *****:

"A University of Toronto professor and Nobel Prize winner, often referred to as the “Godfather of AI,” is warning that the technology could develop and “make us irrelevant” without significant research into how to control it."

That's why Elon musk said developing AI is like summoning a demon...

Oh wow this took a whole motherfucking two more seconds and it's Harvard and a major former Google employee, you know, but Google knows nothing about AI right? Apparently you're too dumb to use a search engine and/or can't read:


Oh wow, this took another two seconds:


But you're not gonna want to even try to understand how dangerous that is nor what role that plays in vaccine technology, as the medical industry wants to biometric track your internal electrical signals.

Cell phones and cell towers and smart watches, and other smart devices all work with electromagnetic fields that communicates with nanotech inside of your body designed to work with and communicate using specific electromagnetic frequencies. The Internet of bodies and nanotech revolution. That's even part of the quantum dot vaccine technology developed by Bill Gates.

Here's one more from the RAND corporation but do you even know who the **** the RAND corporation is?


Quit bitching that's a lot to go on
 
Last edited:
So because I didn't answer you stupid questions the way you wanted me to answer them you decided to post the same shit. Like I said, you have been using the search button since the first forum you got banned from. It's all you got. You are a dumb guy who trolls people and they relives the conversations over and over.
No, you simply don't answer AT ALL when the answer will put your claim or argument in the trash.
Yes. The search button helps me change the past and fabricate posts you never made here and that I don't actually recall you making. 🙄


You are the only one trolling. Had you been gifted with even half a brain you could have comprehended that.
You use the word comprehend so much, yet you lack the ability.
Like that time you couldn't comprehend the difference between real pricing and nominal pricing.

Let me help you along. You love to insult right-wingers as if they are the only one's with religion.
They are the ones using religion as the basis for how laws should be made and how government should be run.
Find me a liberal trying to bring Bibles back into the public school system.

Yes, that is what a troll does, what you do.
As opposed to telling people 100x to "go eat diicks"?
You really offer a lot to conversation...

Who gives a **** if you accept anything. I fully believe people lie to you constantly just to **** with you. Mom and Dad aren't dead, they just can't stand you. It's your burden that you have chosen to never believe anyone. You created that wall in your life. Your problem is you keep stacking bricks. Yes, **** your feelings. Your entitled feelings that everyone owes you a response.
Way to not comprehend how debate works. Not terribly surprising though, considering all the other stuff from early schooling that you you don't know.

Why, because you refused to accept it when I wrote it the past 4+ times? Use the ******* search button troll.
Your answer was to accept Trump's claim, and that I am not an importer if I buy a bike from a wholesaler in China and have it shipped here.
Did you forget your own posts?
1734020974377.png

1734021028895.png


Isn't it crazy how just by using the search function, I was able to go back in time and create those posts that didn't exist before, in order to support my claims?

I almost make it look like I REMEMBERED that you made the posts, and I simply had to go find them.
Quite the Svengali, huh?
 
A gay preacher told his congregation that the bible was not dictated by God and the Mother God is non-binary. His church was then struck by lightning.

Basically, God pulled a "Will Smith."

God was like "You can mock me. You can mock the Bible, but keep my wife's name out of your fricken mouth!"


https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/06/07/church-lightning-burn-*****/
 
Neither of those a requisite for being human...or do you think non US citizens are not human?
They are not requisite for being human, but you don't get one if you're NOT a legal person of the human (?)species.

Show me a B.C. or SSN issued to a *****.
Show me one issued to a horse, or a dolphin, or a cat.

This is just one of the common double standards we get from the feminist movement. It's a baby when they want to be a baby and it's a clump of cells when that's convenient for them.
And it can continue that was until someone can provide absolutes.

Slappy thinks aborting a zygote is not aborting a baby because the cells haven't "combined", even though a zygote is the very first cell that then splits, and they split, and so on, through the process. He thinks a dog ***** IS a baby that should not be aborted because it LOOKS like a human *****.

For reasons unknown, Thxone thinks that the cells become a baby at some point indistinct between 8 and 9 weeks.

Medical science says a ***** is a ***** until it is born, and then it is a neonate. But it is NOT a neonate before birth, which is very specific.

When the people who are fighting to ban abortion can't even agree on what is or is not "killing a baby", how is it reasonable to demand laws that prevent it from happening?
A tangential situation was the religious right demanding censorship of TV and radio that they felt was hurting society.
They couldn't define the offensive material so that the performers and entertainment industry could stop doing it. They simply said "we know it when we see it or hear it"
REALLY? YOU know it when YOU see it or hear it? Your personal reaction is what should be used to determine how the rest of society should perceive things?

NOPE. If people want to stop abortion, they really need to get their shit together and come up with definitive guidelines and standards of what is what. Don't tell me that the clump of cells becomes a "baby" "at some point in time between here and there" and that we should no longer be able to abort "at some point in between here and there".
Don't have one person saying it's "killing baby" if done the day after conception, while another says it's not "killing a baby" until some point between 8 and 9 weeks, while the law doesn't even consider it a legal person until it is born, and medical science confirms a very clear distinction between ***** and neonate.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,268
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top