Current events discussion

Seriously... why are you here? You demand everything then deny everything? Why?
I've already posted multiple times why I debate in these threads.

YOU are the one who constantly complains about reading of Trump's failings in the Trump being Trump thread.
I've asked multiple times why you stick around in a place you obviously hate to be.
I'll ask again: If you hate the thread so much, why do you insist on being in it?
 
I've already posted multiple times why I debate in these threads.

YOU are the one who constantly complains about reading of Trump's failings in the Trump being Trump thread.
I've asked multiple times why you stick around in a place you obviously hate to be.
I'll ask again: If you hate the thread so much, why do you insist on being in it?
You are NOT debating. You are demanding and then replying with no.
 
Why do you think whatever you post here must be accepted as facts, and not questioned?
I DON'T think that you piece of shit but every post you make prove you think that any post made by the non left is not valid. Even if it once came from the left. As soon as you see a new post, before you even look for the trigger words you are wondering how you will claim the post is not valid.
 
Last edited:
Now you want me to pay to help Thxone find proof of his claim?
No thanks.
It's HIS claim to prove, not mine.

The GPO Final Report report on what happened. No paywall, just the report: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-J6-REPORT/pdf/GPO-J6-REPORT.pdf

Some interesting quotes:

"President Trump refused, and instead said this in his public remarks
that evening: “This is a fraud on the American public. This is an embarrassment
to our country. We were getting ready to win this election.
Frankly, we did win this election. We did win this election . . . . We want all
voting to stop.” 37 And on the morning of November 5th, he tweeted “STOP
THE COUNT!
” 38 Halting the counting of votes at that point would have violated
both State and Federal laws.39

"When it became clear to him that securing the Capitol would require
additional resources, Chief Sund requested the assistance of the DC
National Guard.166 During a 2:30 p.m. call set up by HSEMA Director Rodriguez,
the USCP specified the support they needed from the Guard.167 Mayor
Bowser also made “two urgent requests of the President” that she communicated
to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.168 One was for the National Guard’s
assistance.169 The other was that the President make a statement asking
“people to leave, to leave the building and to get out of the city, to stop.” 170
At 2:56 p.m., Meadows told Mayor Bowser that the President “had approved
the request” and was “going to make a statement.” 171"

"The testimony of a White House employee with national security
responsibilities also corroborated these facts. This employee testified about
a conversation between Pat Cipollone and Eric Herschmann in which Herschmann
indicated that the President did not want to do anything to halt
the violence.
That employee told the Select Committee that he overheard
Herschmann saying something to the effect of “the President didn’t want
anything done.” 478

Multiple members of the Oath Keepers have pleaded guilty to seditious
conspiracy. Brian Ulrich started planning for January 6th right after President
Trump sent out his December 19th tweet. The Department of Justice
summarized Ulrich’s communications, as follows:
Ulrich messaged the “Oath Keepers of Georgia” Signal group chat,
“Trump acts now maybe a few hundred radicals die trying to burn
down cities . . . Trump sits on his hands Biden wins . . . millions die
resisting the death of the 1st and 2nd amendment.” On December
20, 2020, an individual in the “Oath Keepers of Georgia” Signal
group chat, who later traveled with Ulrich to Washington, D.C., and
breached the Capitol grounds with Ulrich on January 6, 2021, messaged,
“January 6th. The great reset. America or not.” 345

The Justice Department’s Statement of Offense for Oath Keeper Joshua
James provided these details:
In advance of and on January 6, 2021, James and others agreed to
take part in the plan developed by Rhodes to use any means necessary,
up to and including the use of force, to stop the lawful transfer
of presidential powe
r. In the weeks leading up to January 6, 2021,
Rhodes instructed James and other coconspirators to be prepared, if
called upon, to report to the White House grounds to secure the
perimeter and use lethal force if necessary against anyone who tried
to remove President Trump from the White House, including the
National Guard or other government actors
who might be sent to
remove President Trump as a result of the Presidential Election.346

You know, "Wearing hats and waving flags" because "orange man good".
Why do you keep attributing things to me that I didn't say? I DIDN'T say to pay to review THX's proof. I told you a 30 second Google search would have confirmed that quote for free. Anything but acknowledge the left's role to keep the NG on the sideline.
 
I DON'T think that you piece of shit but every post you make prove you think that any post made by the non left is not valid. Even if it once came from the left.
"You are demanding and then replying with no."
So it upsets you that I reply with a "no" when I see bullshit, but you don't "THINK" it?
As soon as you see a new post, before you even look for the trigger words you are wondering how you will claim the post is not valid.
Says the guy who posted almost nothing while I was away form the forum, and then jumped right in with an inane response when I came back and posted about Trump.

You get triggered the second you see his name, and you jump to his defense, even regarding things he himself admitted doing.
 
"You are demanding and then replying with no."
So it upsets you that I reply with a "no" when I see bullshit, but you don't "THINK" it?

Says the guy who posted almost nothing while I was away form the forum, and then jumped right in with an inane response when I came back and posted about Trump.

You get triggered the second you see his name, and you jump to his defense, even regarding things he himself admitted doing.
The point is you think it is ALL BULLSHIT. You know how I know? Because you are literally and have literally argued EVERYTHING IN OPPOSITION. You are doing this to amuse yourself.
 
Why do you keep attributing things to me that I didn't say? I DIDN'T say to pay to review THX's proof. I told you a 30 second Google search would have confirmed that quote for free. Anything but acknowledge the left's role to keep the NG on the sideline.
You suggested that it was just a paywall. Paywall means an expense on my part.
I will not incur an expense for Thxone to try to prove his own lies.

TSS. Anything but acknowledge what actually happened, even when the final report from the Select Committee says what happened. Especially since "good orange man" had actual culpability.

"When it became clear to him that securing the Capitol would require
additional resources, Chief Sund requested the assistance of the DC
National Guard.166 During a 2:30 p.m. call set up by HSEMA Director Rodriguez,
the USCP specified the support they needed from the Guard.167 Mayor
Bowser also made two urgent requests of the President” that she communicated
to Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.168 One was for the National Guard’s
assistance
.169 The other was that the President make a statement asking
“people to leave, to leave the building and to get out of the city, to stop.
” 170
At 2:56 p.m., Meadows told Mayor Bowser that the President “had approved
the request” and was “going to make a statement.”

A statement made at 4:17PM.
Was he busy making french fries at McDndald's?

1:09 p.m.: (Capitol Police Chief Steven) Sund tells Irving and Stenger by phone that the National Guard is needed. Sund says both men told him they would “run it up the chain.”
 
The point is you think it is ALL BULLSHIT. You know how I know? Because you are literally and have literally argued EVERYTHING IN OPPOSITION. You are doing this to amuse yourself.
Except when I argue in opposition, I can prove that things are bullshit.

You, on the other hand, offer something like "my recollection is that such and such happened".
Your recollections don't prove a thing, other than that you have a recollection.
 
Except when I argue in opposition, I can prove that things are bullshit.
Who gives a phuck if your goal in life is to be an insufferable know-it-all.
You, on the other hand, offer something like "my recollection is that such and such happened".
Your recollections don't prove a thing, other than that you have a recollection.
Where as you on there other hand have NO recollection because you have Google.
 
Stage two to implement planatir Ai and drone surveillance. Possibly FF soon

IMG_8910.jpeg
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,949
Views
493,836
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top