You never had too. Take Nancy's word.Deflecting what? He cxlaimed Pelosi took responsibility for the NG not deploying fast enough, and used a link behind a paywall, and a quote from someone else who claimed the same.
I said I'm not paying to see his "proof" and I'm not accepting a quote of someone else saying she is at fault as proof.
So you don't give a phuck, but just felt the urge to type regarding something you don't give a phuck about.Nope, wrong again. You are not good at this.
The shit that you make up on a regular basis.Where do you come up with this shit? Do you roll 11 sided dice and just point a the New York Times news paper and pick that word and go from there?
This may come as a shock, but you are actually not the only person to exist.Us? Are you more than one person now? Also... what are "won" words?
So "abortion is not banned in Florida", except when it IS banned in Florida.It is not fully banned in Florida. It is only partially banned. As we know, a partial ban is not complete or total. So, I am right Rob and YOU may want to go check your facts.
Legal prohibition of abortion in Florida. Official since May 2024:Ban
verb
past tense: banned; past participle: banned
- officially or legally prohibit.
You are still wrong.So you don't give a phuck, but just felt the urge to type regarding something you don't give a phuck about.
Who said that you were entitled to even see one?The shit that you make up on a regular basis.
Still waiting for a W2 that lists occupation on it. For anyone.
Don't even try it. You are trying to include other people to be with you. Nobody is with you Rob.This may come as a shock, but you are actually not the only person to exist.
There are a number of people who see the posts you put up. I consider myself plus the other people who see your nonsense to be "us". As in a group doing a similar thing.
It is not fully banned. So technically I am right. You hate that don't you lol.So "abortion is not banned in Florida", except when it IS banned in Florida.
Like I said, not fully banned.Legal prohibition of abortion in Florida. Official since May 2024:
"A physician may not knowingly perform or induce a termination of pregnancy if the physician determines the gestational age of the ***** is more than 6 weeks unless one of the following conditions is met:"
Chapter 390 - 2024 Florida Statutes - The Florida Senate
www.flsenate.gov
You never had too. Take Nancy's word.
Are you going to spin it? Deny she said it? Or claim it is right wing propaganda?Yeah.
"This is ridiculous. You’re going to ask me in the middle of the thing when they’ve already breached…that, should we call the Capitol Police? I mean the National Guard? Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?"
Her aide appeared to reply that Capitol security did believe they were prepared, to which Pelosi continued, "They clearly didn’t know, and I take responsibility for not having them just prepared for more."
Kind of like a CEO who take responsibility when one of their employees ***** up big time.
Kind of like what a grown, responsible person does.
Unlike Trump, who fails constantly, and then wants to poitn the finger at everyone else.
HE was in command of the National Guard in DC. pelosi shouldn't HAVE to assume the responsibility of having the Guard "prepared for more", when TRUMP was the one in charge.
But I guess he really wasn't in charge, huh? Incapable of handling the truths of the day. Incapable of handling the day.
She didn't take responsibility for the NG not being there. She was taking responsibility for not being prepared to cover for Trump's failures.Are you going to spin it? Deny she said it? Or claim it is right wing propaganda?
So just another bullshit claim you made that you can't prove.You are still wrong.
Who said that you were entitled to even see one?
There is no one else readign this thread?Don't even try it. You are trying to include other people to be with you. Nobody is with you Rob.
You said it is not banned.It is not fully banned. So technically I am right. You hate that don't you lol.
UNlike what you said.Like I said, not fully banned.
Wrong again. that's 3 for 3.So just another bullshit claim you made that you can't prove.
Tell me, who exactly is on your side?There is no one else readign this thread?
Interesting.
So Jimi just types random shit that coincidentally matches the ongoing posts of the thread. As do buck, Stocker, Spokey, chillin...
Pretty amazing.
I said it is partially banned. Not fully banned. I know that is hard for you to comprehend but they are facts. Sorry about your ego. However, I am 100% correct.You said it is not banned.
If it is not banned, then it is not banned.
Except it is banned. You were wrong. Again.
Stop the backlpedal, and just admit you fucked up.
Or does your NPD prevent you from admitting you fucked up.
You are right, the law says partially banned, in other words. If it were BANNED then there would be no abortions at ANY time... however, there are. So, not fully banned. Awwweeeeee.UNlike what you said.
You said "Abortion is not banned in Flroida"
The law says otherwise.
It was and is the lefts fault for not having the proper security there.She didn't take responsibility for the NG not being there. She was taking responsibility for not being prepared to cover for Trump's failures.
As in "I should have KNOWN he'd **** this up, and prepared better to prevent it".
Just like all the right-wingers complaining "I voted for Trump to do this, but never thought he'd do it to ME..." They blame themselves for Trump ******* them over.
Nobody is asking you to pay anything. For 3rd, 4th, 5th time you could have easily googled a free source for that info. Iirc, it was from a congressional investigation or subcommittee, etc.Deflecting what? He cxlaimed Pelosi took responsibility for the NG not deploying fast enough, and used a link behind a paywall, and a quote from someone else who claimed the same.
I said I'm not paying to see his "proof" and I'm not accepting a quote of someone else saying she is at fault as proof.
So Team Red chose to let the events of J6 happen, even though they knew shit was likely to go South in advance of the election:
"At 1:42 a.m., on December 19th, President Trump tweeted: “Big protest
in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!” 4
The President’s tweet galvanized tens of thousands of his supporters
around the country. President Trump had been lying to them since election
day, claiming he won, and that the Democrats had stolen victory from him.
Now, with a single tweet, the President focused his supporters’ anger on
the joint session of Congress in Washington, DC on January 6th.
Anika Navaroli, the longest-tenured member of Twitter’s Trust and
Safety Policy team, monitored the reaction to President Trump’s “be wild”
tweet. She told the Select Committee that the President was “essentially
staking a flag in DC . . . for his supporters to come and rally.” 5 The tweet
created a “fire hose” of calls to overthrow the U.S. Government. President
Trump’s supporters had a new sense of urgency because they felt “as if
their Commander in Chief” had summoned them.6
For many extremists and conspiracy theorists, the President’s
announcement was a call to arms.7"
“Stop the Steal” events and other protests throughout 2020 helped
build the momentum for January 6th. The Select Committee collected data
on 85 right-wing events between January 1, 2020, and January 20, 2021,
which were inspired by opposition to COVID-19 lockdown measures, racial
justice protests, and, later, the perceived theft of President Trump’s victory.
54 Far-right extremists protested at or inside State capitols, or at other
government buildings, in at least 68 instances.55 Of those, 49 occurred during
the period after the election through January 6th.56 In the year leading
up to January 6th, there were at least nine events at which far-right actors
entered State capitols.57At least four of these capitol incursions—in
Michigan,58 Idaho,59 Arizona,60 and Oregon61—involved identifiable individuals
who later participated in the attack on the U.S. Capitol.
And team Red thought that if Trump LOST the election, things were just going to be calm? Their big concern was "optics" of having professional people in control (police, sheriff deputies, National Guard, whatever) in place would be bad "optics"?
Bad "optics" for the same people who cheer on the likes of a Kyle Rittenhouse, driving from Illinois to Wisconsin to pretend to be a cop, and killing two people?
Please.
You'll never convince Rob that Rittenhouse didn't go up there to shoot "innocent" people...As for Rittenhouse, when you're stupid enough to attack someone with an AR, that's on you not the gun owner.
Well he had a fully automatic "Assault Rifle"!! HE went there to support the supreme white leader!!!You'll never convince Rob that Rittenhouse didn't go up there to shoot "innocent" people...