Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The Court of Appeals is not the Supreme Court, and they do not rule on whether things are constitutional or not.
oops.

Never said it was.

Yet when I specifically mentioned SCOTUS and being surprised they heard the case, you confirmed they had, and declared their decision meant Trump's action was legal.
A lie. Disappointing behavior.
View attachment 66042

I wasn't answering your question I was ignoring your dumb *** question and finishing my point by asking you libbys a question.

You could have saved some typing and just said "I can't."

You think I have a W2 from 5 years ago? I have moved several times since then. Again, common sense nor critical thinking are in your wheelhouse.

So, another lie.
You really stack them up, huh?

DEEZNUTZ!!!

The Court of Appeals is not SCOTUS, and "it was likely" is not a definitive answer.
Did he or did he not lawfully exercise his authority?

LOL

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

"In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard.


It said that while presidents don’t have unfettered power to seize control of a state’s guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters." - PBS

Before you claim any kind of bullshit there are many news sources siting the same thing.

LOL, notice how Rob poopoo's that this isn't tbe SCOTUS. Yet he has no issue with lower courts interfering with deportations.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

LOL, notice how Rob poopoo's that this isn't tbe SCOTUS. Yet he has no issue with lower courts interfering with deportations.

Oh I noticed.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

LOL, notice how Rob poopoo's that this isn't tbe SCOTUS. Yet he has no issue with lower courts interfering with deportations.

It's (literally) whatever tool helps the (thing) go in their favor is appropriate and just but then as soon as the same tool is against them it is all phucked up and not the final legal word!! So sayeth the shepherd, so sayeth RobGMN!!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I can't wait for the 4th of July. I want a MAGA fireworks show!!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Never said it was.

You said it was decided the action was constitutional, and confirmed that SCOTUS had heard the case.
SCOTUS never heard it, so you were claiming the Court of Appeals was SCOTUS.

I wasn't answering your question I was ignoring your dumb *** question and finishing my point by asking you libbys a question.

Another failed backepedal. Should have gone for your "sarcasm" excuse. It might have fit better.
Not believable, mind you, just not as lame as the above attempt.

You think I have a W2 from 5 years ago? I have moved several times since then. Again, common sense nor critical thinking are in your wheelhouse.

I asked for a W2 from ANY state in the US. ANY state's W2 that shows occupation.
Even easier, just name the state and the line number on the W2 where the occuaption gets listed.
I'll get a copy of the form myself.

DEEZNUTZ!!!

Like a child who gets caught in yet another lie.
Did you coin "DEEZNUTZ" before or after "smooth brain"?

LOL

So you can't answer. Got in over your head immediately.
Cool.

LOL, notice how Rob poopoo's that this isn't tbe SCOTUS. Yet he has no issue with lower courts interfering with deportations.

A logical fallacy deflection that has nothing to do with your lies that SCOTUS ruled what Trump did was constitutional.
ADD, perhaps?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You said it was decided the action was constitutional, and confrimed that SCOTUS had heard the case.
SCOTUS never heard it, so you were claiming the Court of Appeals was SCOTUS.

Another failed backepedal. Should have gone for your "sarcasm" excuse. It might have fit better.
Not believable, mind you, just not as lame as the above attempt.

Nobody cares that you can't handle it. Argue all you want. Claim a backpedal all you want. It does not change the fact that TRUMP WON!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Just admit your life is trash if Trump isn't in it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nobody cares that you can't handle it. Argue all you want. Claim a backpedal all you want. It does not change the fact that TRUMP WON!

Won the SCTOUS decision? Nope. Case hasn't been heard yet.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Just admit your life is trash if Trump isn't in it.

You get weird when you drink.
Or is it just on Friday and Saturday nights by default?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Won the SCTOUS decision? Nope. Case hasn't been heard yet.

LOL Holy Shit. You are actually that far gone with TDS!!! You don't get to decide Rob.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Unanimously decided to be LEGAL!!!!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You might be better off Rob, getting on a plane to Nippon, climbing Mount Fuji and thinking your life over for a while. You NEED Trump.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

LOL Holy Shit. You are actually that far gone with TDS!!! You don't get to decide Rob.

Decide what? That SCOTUS hasn't heard the case?
That's not a "decision" I made; it's just a fact.

Do you believe SCOTUS heard the case?

Unanimously decided to be LEGAL!!!!

Incorrect. Again.
"Though it ruled in Trump’s favor, the court also rejected an argument from the Administration that the National Guard deployment could not be reviewed, however."

What the Appeals Court Said About Trump’s National Guard Power

A federal appeals court has overturned an earlier ruling that found the President’s mobilization of the troops was “illegal.”

time.com

That means it can be decided by another court whether it was legal.
That court would be SCOTUS, and COA doesn't get to decide if an act is constitutional, or not.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

LOL Holy Shit. You are actually that far gone with TDS!!! You don't get to decide Rob.

Now that I argue with Rob, you can see his arguments a mile away. Ultimately, he rather create thus delusion about you saying SCOTUS ruled Trump's use of the Natl Guard than just accept thd courts sided with Trump. That path gives Rob everything he wants: in his mind, he's proven you wrong; in his mind, Trump remains in violation of the COTUS; if/when SCOTUS does rule in favor of Trump, that will jyst prove there has been a Fascist take over of ghe gov't and lastly Robs record moves to an impressive 1755 & 0.