So far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.I did, did you not read the OP? All those statements are the truth
Some of those girls are soooo fine. I never realized I was into pale skin or tattoos, but it works. Some of 'em curvy, too.SuicideGirls is where it's at bro. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif
I must say, short of Audioholic (but he ain't here no mo, *cry*), you are the king of debate. Only guy using the word affidavits, lol. There is also some pretty funny **** in there, too, had me belly chuckling over my breakfast.So far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.
For example:
"On (Insert date here) (insert name of complainant here) of (Insert city and state of complainant here) bought (Insert offending item in question here)."
From there you can post any actual evidence (pictures of products, receipts, paypal/credit card claim, or sworn affidavits) then post Coleman's response (or state that he has not responded).
What this does is gives Coleman something substantial to address, gives the rest of us some idea of how many people are claiming wrongdoing, and also lets us see who these people are and what evidence they can show and determine the validity of their claims based on not only their reputation but their evidence. I'm not even saying some of that isn't true but I'd bet my life's savings that some of it is bullshit by scammers looking to get over or just people who have a beef against CT Sounds.
Honestly this is like reading a CNN headline then when you actually look at the story it's "sources familiar with XXX say" or "a Washington insider said". It's just incredibly lazy and dishonest for all involved.
If you care so much post facts and specifics as you would present them if you were a credible journalist or as if you were presenting them to a jury. "Some guy on faceberg said" is only taken seriously in a 9th grade girl's bathroom or in some hoodrat shootout over "disrespect".
If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifSo far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.
For example:
"On (Insert date here) (insert name of complainant here) of (Insert city and state of complainant here) bought (Insert offending item in question here)."
From there you can post any actual evidence (pictures of products, receipts, paypal/credit card claim, or sworn affidavits) then post Coleman's response (or state that he has not responded).
What this does is gives Coleman something substantial to address, gives the rest of us some idea of how many people are claiming wrongdoing, and also lets us see who these people are and what evidence they can show and determine the validity of their claims based on not only their reputation but their evidence. I'm not even saying some of that isn't true but I'd bet my life's savings that some of it is bullshit by scammers looking to get over or just people who have a beef against CT Sounds.
Honestly this is like reading a CNN headline then when you actually look at the story it's "sources familiar with XXX say" or "a Washington insider said". It's just incredibly lazy and dishonest for all involved.
If you care so much post facts and specifics as you would present them if you were a credible journalist or as if you were presenting them to a jury. "Some guy on faceberg said" is only taken seriously in a 9th grade girl's bathroom or in some hoodrat shootout over "disrespect".
I deserve that. But I like both of you, my head is going back and forth as you debate. It's like watching friends play ping pong. In Ding Dang.If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
So you admit that you don't actually care about anybody getting scammed or uncovering any truth, but just want to stir up trouble and participate in some knitting circle social media gossip. You and the rest of the girls can gossip about who various celebrities are dating next.If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
This isn't even a debate. OP is making some wild claims off of some rumor and hearsay on social media and I'm trying to ferret out some facts. Facts to me are sworn statements by competent witnesses, unadulterated pictures or documents from credible and verifiable sources.I deserve that. But I like both of you, my head is going back and forth as you debate. It's like watching friends play ping pong. In Ding Dang.
LOL no that's not what I said at all. I'm not going to feed you, I've already stated my reasoning for posting this, feel free to shitpost all you want //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/redface.gif.62fdbfe1a101588a808c4cff71bcb942.gifSo you admit that you don't actually care about anybody getting scammed or uncovering any truth, but just want to stir up trouble and participate in some knitting circle social media gossip. You and the rest of the girls can gossip about who various celebrities are dating next.
This isn't even a debate. OP is making some wild claims off of some rumor and hearsay on social media and I'm trying to ferret out some facts. Facts to me are sworn statements by competent witnesses, unadulterated pictures or documents from credible and verifiable sources.
LOL no that's not what I said at all. I'm not going to feed you, I've already stated my reasoning for posting this, feel free to shitpost all you want //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/redface.gif.62fdbfe1a101588a808c4cff71bcb942.gif
So an informational post without any single fact or information. About the only information I'm getting out of this is a confirmation that I'm making the right move by continuing to avoid getting involved with social media... nothing of any value ever happens there.but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifSo an informational post without any single fact or information. About the only information I'm getting out of this is a confirmation that I'm making the right move by continuing to avoid getting involved with social media... nothing of any value ever happens there.
How am I a troll in this? YOU are the one making some serious accusations against a company and have so far provided zero evidence.
And yet you still have provided none. I guess I'll need to sign up to faceberg to get all the really juicy gossip.Evidence is far and wide,
Hey congrats, you're doing your own research like an adult //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gifAnd yet you still have provided none. I guess I'll need to sign up to faceberg to get all the really juicy gossip.
So you seem to think posting stuff about the issues in the off topic section of this site is going to accomplish anything? Totally not the place for such nonsense.A lot of what I'm talking about is occurring on Facebook. It's a variety of the things in the last few lines of my post. If this was the first time it came up, I wouldn't be starting ****. I'm tired of seeing people go and buy this product based on Coleman throwing a bone to people now and then and hiding negativity by filing frivolous DMCA complaints to get people to shut up.