**** CT Sounds (2018 Edition)

I did, did you not read the OP? All those statements are the truth
So far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.

For example:

"On (Insert date here) (insert name of complainant here) of (Insert city and state of complainant here) bought (Insert offending item in question here)."

From there you can post any actual evidence (pictures of products, receipts, paypal/credit card claim, or sworn affidavits) then post Coleman's response (or state that he has not responded).

What this does is gives Coleman something substantial to address, gives the rest of us some idea of how many people are claiming wrongdoing, and also lets us see who these people are and what evidence they can show and determine the validity of their claims based on not only their reputation but their evidence. I'm not even saying some of that isn't true but I'd bet my life's savings that some of it is bullshit by scammers looking to get over or just people who have a beef against CT Sounds.

Honestly this is like reading a CNN headline then when you actually look at the story it's "sources familiar with XXX say" or "a Washington insider said". It's just incredibly lazy and dishonest for all involved.

If you care so much post facts and specifics as you would present them if you were a credible journalist or as if you were presenting them to a jury. "Some guy on faceberg said" is only taken seriously in a 9th grade girl's bathroom or in some hoodrat shootout over "disrespect".

 
SuicideGirls is where it's at bro. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif
Some of those girls are soooo fine. I never realized I was into pale skin or tattoos, but it works. Some of 'em curvy, too.
 
So far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.
For example:

"On (Insert date here) (insert name of complainant here) of (Insert city and state of complainant here) bought (Insert offending item in question here)."

From there you can post any actual evidence (pictures of products, receipts, paypal/credit card claim, or sworn affidavits) then post Coleman's response (or state that he has not responded).

What this does is gives Coleman something substantial to address, gives the rest of us some idea of how many people are claiming wrongdoing, and also lets us see who these people are and what evidence they can show and determine the validity of their claims based on not only their reputation but their evidence. I'm not even saying some of that isn't true but I'd bet my life's savings that some of it is bullshit by scammers looking to get over or just people who have a beef against CT Sounds.

Honestly this is like reading a CNN headline then when you actually look at the story it's "sources familiar with XXX say" or "a Washington insider said". It's just incredibly lazy and dishonest for all involved.

If you care so much post facts and specifics as you would present them if you were a credible journalist or as if you were presenting them to a jury. "Some guy on faceberg said" is only taken seriously in a 9th grade girl's bathroom or in some hoodrat shootout over "disrespect".
I must say, short of Audioholic (but he ain't here no mo, *cry*), you are the king of debate. Only guy using the word affidavits, lol. There is also some pretty funny **** in there, too, had me belly chuckling over my breakfast.
 
So far, all those statements are hearsay at best. Treat this like an exercise in journalism who what why where and when.
For example:

"On (Insert date here) (insert name of complainant here) of (Insert city and state of complainant here) bought (Insert offending item in question here)."

From there you can post any actual evidence (pictures of products, receipts, paypal/credit card claim, or sworn affidavits) then post Coleman's response (or state that he has not responded).

What this does is gives Coleman something substantial to address, gives the rest of us some idea of how many people are claiming wrongdoing, and also lets us see who these people are and what evidence they can show and determine the validity of their claims based on not only their reputation but their evidence. I'm not even saying some of that isn't true but I'd bet my life's savings that some of it is bullshit by scammers looking to get over or just people who have a beef against CT Sounds.

Honestly this is like reading a CNN headline then when you actually look at the story it's "sources familiar with XXX say" or "a Washington insider said". It's just incredibly lazy and dishonest for all involved.

If you care so much post facts and specifics as you would present them if you were a credible journalist or as if you were presenting them to a jury. "Some guy on faceberg said" is only taken seriously in a 9th grade girl's bathroom or in some hoodrat shootout over "disrespect".
If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
I deserve that. But I like both of you, my head is going back and forth as you debate. It's like watching friends play ping pong. In Ding Dang.
 
If I thought Coleman would address it I would actually cite it like a report but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for. Not appease the devils advocate in a forum troll //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
So you admit that you don't actually care about anybody getting scammed or uncovering any truth, but just want to stir up trouble and participate in some knitting circle social media gossip. You and the rest of the girls can gossip about who various celebrities are dating next.

I deserve that. But I like both of you, my head is going back and forth as you debate. It's like watching friends play ping pong. In Ding Dang.
This isn't even a debate. OP is making some wild claims off of some rumor and hearsay on social media and I'm trying to ferret out some facts. Facts to me are sworn statements by competent witnesses, unadulterated pictures or documents from credible and verifiable sources.

 
So you admit that you don't actually care about anybody getting scammed or uncovering any truth, but just want to stir up trouble and participate in some knitting circle social media gossip. You and the rest of the girls can gossip about who various celebrities are dating next.


This isn't even a debate. OP is making some wild claims off of some rumor and hearsay on social media and I'm trying to ferret out some facts. Facts to me are sworn statements by competent witnesses, unadulterated pictures or documents from credible and verifiable sources.
LOL no that's not what I said at all. I'm not going to feed you, I've already stated my reasoning for posting this, feel free to shitpost all you want //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/redface.gif.62fdbfe1a101588a808c4cff71bcb942.gif

 
LOL no that's not what I said at all. I'm not going to feed you, I've already stated my reasoning for posting this, feel free to shitpost all you want //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/redface.gif.62fdbfe1a101588a808c4cff71bcb942.gif
but this is a forum thread for informing people of what to look out for
So an informational post without any single fact or information. About the only information I'm getting out of this is a confirmation that I'm making the right move by continuing to avoid getting involved with social media... nothing of any value ever happens there.

How am I a troll in this? YOU are the one making some serious accusations against a company and have so far provided zero evidence.

 
So an informational post without any single fact or information. About the only information I'm getting out of this is a confirmation that I'm making the right move by continuing to avoid getting involved with social media... nothing of any value ever happens there.
How am I a troll in this? YOU are the one making some serious accusations against a company and have so far provided zero evidence.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

This post isn't for you, but if you want to order from him go ahead //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

Evidence is far and wide, you just are too entitled to look.

 
And yet you still have provided none. I guess I'll need to sign up to faceberg to get all the really juicy gossip.
Hey congrats, you're doing your own research like an adult //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif

 
A lot of what I'm talking about is occurring on Facebook. It's a variety of the things in the last few lines of my post. If this was the first time it came up, I wouldn't be starting ****. I'm tired of seeing people go and buy this product based on Coleman throwing a bone to people now and then and hiding negativity by filing frivolous DMCA complaints to get people to shut up.
So you seem to think posting stuff about the issues in the off topic section of this site is going to accomplish anything? Totally not the place for such nonsense.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

wew lad

5,000+ posts
wew lad inc
Thread starter
wew lad
Joined
Location
VA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
57
Views
3,387
Last reply date
Last reply from
Papermaker85
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top