Rashaddd
5,000+ posts
Terrrrrist
exactlyIreally don't see how it could get much worse.Seems like over the past 50 years, morals in general have really disintegrated
in America.
exactlyIreally don't see how it could get much worse.Seems like over the past 50 years, morals in general have really disintegrated
in America.
I think your problem is that you're imagining our living energy as something that continues on, when it doesn't really. Our movement, thinking, and general living is a result of taking in energy from food. When we're dead, the majority of the energy left in our system from our last meal is absorbed by organisms decomposing the body. The energy is not lumped; it isn't a single transferrable entity like a soul.aren't you the one who is claiming that energy cannot be created or destroyed, which i believe, well if it can't be destroyed, and we are all basically from the same source of energy, wouldn't we almost have to be eternal in some way, shape or form? or a i just thinking to hard
There was a problem with an electrical connection that caused liquid helium to flood the vacuum layer; that damaged some of the super-conducting magnets.oh, and it said that the large hadron collider didn't complete it's operation because failure of some bending magnets of some sort. So, i guess it wasn't really put to the test.
That depends on how you define morality. For example, traditional context suggests sexuality is immoral...I don't believe that to be the case. A lot of what people are calling a loss of morality is really just the loss of control over individuals.Ireally don't see how it could get much worse.Seems like over the past 50 years, morals in general have really disintegrated
in America.
Well I don't think the universe defies logic but to say that it began at such and such a time, without any existence 'before' that seems to. It defies basic tautology A=A, what exists exists, what does not exist, does not exist. For existence to come from non-existence we are basically saying that A came from -A, this is not logical. However, this doesn't rule out our common views of the universe beginning. The theological view, which many people don't follow, allows for existence preceding the beginning of the universe, namely God, so exponents of this view may still allow for a logical universe, if they wish.I just recognize the fact that the universe's existence defies logic
x2, i'd say you hit the nail right on the head.Ireally don't see how it could get much worse.Seems like over the past 50 years, morals in general have really disintegrated
in America.
exactlyWell I don't think the universe defies logic but to say that it began at such and such a time, without any existence 'before' that seems to. It defies basic tautology A=A, what exists exists, what does not exist, does not exist. For existence to come from non-existence we are basically saying that A came from -A, this is not logical. However, this doesn't rule out our common views of the universe beginning. The theological view, which many people don't follow, allows for existence preceding the beginning of the universe, namely God, so exponents of this view may still allow for a logical universe, if they wish.
Do you mean "believe in the bible" to mean believe every single word to be exactly and perfectly right. Well I think that is rare of Christians, at least I've never talked to one that has, even fundamentalists I know that claim they believe in the inerrancy of the bible when puched and shown mistakes admit that it does contain some mistakes.What does the bible provide in it's text that makes people believe it is true.
Anywho, I don't know why you're askin similar questions over and over...and to be sincere with you, whatever questioning etc...is is just as illogical, because it appears to me that your own position isn't on any higher ground. Perhaps even lower than most. From what I've seen of you so far I'd say I know a number of theists on here that are more logical. (Not like I'm the objective judge of who is logical and who isn't or anything, I'm just saying how it currently appears to me.)Most religious people say there has to be a god. Why?
I think lack of moral values and people's use of that term point more to breaking a golden social rule (also in the bible, but found in almost all religions due to its poignancy) Do unto others...... people are just too self-centered it seems. With this narcisisism you have a total break down of the social bonds that the human species requires to prosper.....not that we need it, we've over stayed our welcome on this planet imo.That depends on how you define morality. For example, traditional context suggests sexuality is immoral...I don't believe that to be the case. A lot of what people are calling a loss of morality is really just the loss of control over individuals.
Keep in mind that, historically, we have almost always believed that life could not get any worse, or that we are at a moral impasse. That's not something new in the 21st century.
Well I don't think the universe defies logic but to say that it began at such and such a time, without any existence 'before' that seems to. It defies basic tautology A=A, what exists exists, what does not exist, does not exist. For existence to come from non-existence we are basically saying that A came from -A, this is not logical. However, this doesn't rule out our common views of the universe beginning. The theological view, which many people don't follow, allows for existence preceding the beginning of the universe, namely God, so exponents of this view may still allow for a logical universe, if they wish.
i wanna learn more about thisI think lack of moral values and people's use of that term point more to breaking a golden social rule (also in the bible, but found in almost all religions due to its poignancy) Do unto others...... people are just too self-centered it seems. With this narcisisism you have a total break down of the social bonds that the human species requires to prosper.....not that we need it, we've over stayed our welcome on this planet imo.
That's where String Theory comes in //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Life on earth is possible because the conditions to support life are perfect.There is no way a place so complex as earth could exist without an intelligent designer. /Thread
There is nothing complex about plants growing, it's called photosynthesis, and we feel emotions because that is how we as a society have been raised. Human emotion as slowly progessed from caveman times to now.Dude, everything on the earth is super complex, from the way plants grow to the way we feel emotions...Think about itThere is a God. Period.
i really like this guy, seems to know exactly what he is talking about and he can explain it with the best of them. I didn't know he has a book, but i might have to pick it up, even though i don't read, LOLRead Parallel Worlds by Michio Kaku.
well, it is better to have some faith in god. But i agree i think people just used religion as an explanation to why we are here. It seems to make most sense.Life on earth is possible because the conditions to support life are perfect.
There is nothing complex about plants growing, it's called photosynthesis, and we feel emotions because that is how we as a society have been raised. Human emotion as slowly progessed from caveman times to now.
There is no god. You show me proof, and I will believe. Human life is possible on earth because the position in relation to the sun is perfect for life form. Mars can support life as well as many other planets in the universe, you cannot say earth is the only planet in the entire universe that has life on it. If god really existed and "loves" us, why would he/she let people die? I'm not talking about murderers or rapists, but people like the pope or priests, people that WORSHIP god. I think the belief in god was created by humans a looooooooooooong time ago to create an explanation for why we are here, you know, before science proved why we are here.