best net volume for...

best NET cubic ft for 2-10" subs

  • 2 cub ft for burp of 47hz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2.5 cub ft for burp of 47hz

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • 3 cub ft for burp of 47hz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3.5 cub ft for burp of 47hz

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
audioques, I ask because my loudest box is 2.7 cub ft tuned for a 47hz burp, the box tested today had 3.55 cub ft tuned for a 47hz burp and was 3db lower than my loudest box. Im assuming this is due to the increase in volume.

 
it depends on the subs, the power, the bla bla bla, and most importantly the vehicle and the install.

so basically, unless somone has the exact same equipment as you and the same car and did the same install - no one can tell you what will be the best. you just need to keep testing.

 
lol testing cost me $200 in wood $50 in silicone $20 in wood glue and hours and hours of work lol god I love it.

I was curious cause the AQ's are very similar to dd9500's. Someone must have this info. Hey andy you going to watertown for the show tomorrow?

egg

 
audioques, I ask because my loudest box is 2.7 cub ft tuned for a 47hz burp, the box tested today had 3.55 cub ft tuned for a 47hz burp and was 3db lower than my loudest box. Im assuming this is due to the increase in volume.
Well in general smaller box=lower imp. rise

 
Well ive noticed the euros use small boxes but they peak around 60-80hz with there small vehicles, and us use larger boxes that tuned low because of our vehicles but it seems the larger I go the less I gain.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

SPL140.2

5,000+ posts
Team DefJ
Thread starter
SPL140.2
Joined
Location
NY
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
6
Views
583
Last reply date
Last reply from
SPL140.2
IMG_20260513_214311575.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260513_213956814.jpg

ThxOne

    May 13, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top