If ya run an SA8, better have at least that much power, lol. their spl'n them at 3000+ per, lol. Super stiff suspension, crazy high Qts. TSP's from the SA 8 that was brought to me for testing
SA 8 D4 TSP's (in series)
Re = 6.2144 ohms
Fs = 55.0564 Hz
Zmax = 71.3945 ohms
Qes = 0.8103
Qms = 8.4987
Qts = 0.7398
Le = 4.5791 mH (at 1 kHz)
Diam = 158.7500 mm ( 6.2500 in )
Sd = .0198m^2( 30.6796 in^2)
Vas = 3.0363 L ( 0.1072 ft^3)
BL = 20.1586 N/A
Mms = 153.1704 g
Cms = 54.5569 uM/N
Kms = 18329.4824 N/M
Rms = 6.2346 R mechanical
Efficiency = 0.0588 %
Sensitivity = 79.7088 dB @1W/1m
Xmax = 13mm
as you can see it's one of the least efficient subs out right now, becoming known for the pole plug hitting the inverted dust cap during high excursions, but with their suspension that requires alot of power. Rated for 600 daily, as stiff as it is I'm sure thats more of a thermal rating than a mechanical rating.
Here a freq plot showing output, both are in .8 net, the SA prefers 30Hz for flatter response thanks to that crazy Qts, the TB likes 32Hz. Both subs shown with 600 watts applied. ~4.4dB difference @ 34Hz - 37Hz .8 @ 30Hz and ~2dB @ 50Hz.