Aero port once more.

why so big? you realize thats more than 2x RE's recommended size?
http://reaudio.com/specs.html#sp_mx
yeah, re recommends 2.5 cubic feet for an mx.

but that seems way too small for such a huge sub.

but either way, minus sub displacement as well as the aeros.the 4.5 includes the subtraction of the wood displacement, but at the end of the build it will probably turn out smaller. its an odd shapped box so i dont even think the sub will see some the box

 
yeah, re recommends 2.5 cubic feet for an mx. but that seems way too small for such a huge sub.

but either way, minus sub displacement as well as the aeros.the 4.5 includes the subtraction of the wood displacement, but at the end of the build it will probably turn out smaller. its an odd shapped box so i dont even think the sub will see some the box
so youve admitted that your new to this and dont really understand it, yet your ready to go so far against the manufacturers recommendations?

according to their website re recommends 2 cubes. you should do 2@33 with two 4" aeros. after displacement that will gross around 2.7 cubes

psp-inc's length calculator says that each 4" aero should be 29" long (if you actually give the port a 12" length the tuning will be at like 50hz)

is there a reason why you dont just do a slot port?

 
so youve admitted that your new to this and dont really understand it, yet your ready to go so far against the manufacturers recommendations?
according to their website re recommends 2 cubes. you should do 2@33 with two 4" aeros. after displacement that will gross around 2.7 cubes

psp-inc's length calculator says that each 4" aero should be 29" long (if you actually give the port a 12" length the tuning will be at like 50hz)

is there a reason why you dont just do a slot port?
yeah id be ready to drop the aero and do a slot with a quickness. except im trying to get the aero standing up height wise with the box so it can fire through where my stock sub was and get bass into cabin. otherwise too much of it is retained in the trunk.

im not new at car audio, just completely new at aeros so its confusing as hell for me.

with that being said, im going against the manufatures recomendations, because just like every other manufature, they recommend box sizes smaller than they should. re recomds like a cub and a half optimal for the xxx afterall, but just as caraudio magazine reviewed, they give smaller enclosure sizes to be conservative for people. 2.5 ft^3 seems decent enough as recommended by re audio, but after all displacements i should be okay i figure

 
I think you'd be wrong to say that all, or even most, manufacturers recommend excessively small boxes. RE recommends 2.2 optimal for the xxx. and btw 2 cubes is a pretty standard size for a 12, so i wouldn't hesitate to trust their recommendations.

why do you think that a "huge sub" requires a huge box and port?

 
I think you'd be wrong to say that all, or even most, manufacturers recommend excessively small boxes. RE recommends 2.2 optimal for the xxx. and btw 2 cubes is a pretty standard size for a 12, so i wouldn't hesitate to trust their recommendations.
why do you think that a "huge sub" requires a huge box and port?
i dont mean any sub needs a big box.

and port size i wouldnt give my opinion on because i know that goes specifically by tunning.

well i guess i worded myself wrong, while i do think this sub is big, i wasnt trying to say any big sub needs a big box, im just trying to give it more space than what is recommended. i called re and they told me 2.5

i had the box measurements for exactly the box i wanted and the largest i can fit. it ended up being 4.3 and i figured id give it a try like that.

i am highly cosidering going down, but either way i still have the problem that i cant figure out the tunnin with aeros for any box size. so im stuck either way

 
elbow.JPG
 
so youve admitted that your new to this and dont really understand it, yet your ready to go so far against the manufacturers recommendations?
according to their website re recommends 2 cubes. you should do 2@33 with two 4" aeros. after displacement that will gross around 2.7 cubes

psp-inc's length calculator says that each 4" aero should be 29" long (if you actually give the port a 12" length the tuning will be at like 50hz)

is there a reason why you dont just do a slot port?
ooh by the way, i would like to know why you say that if i use two 4" aeros at about 12" length it would be 50hz tunning. i got those number right from psp. unless you did the math on your own. but i dont see why psps numbers come out different.

 
you want the port to be the ports diameter away from the closest side-wall... you'd be limited to about 10" length for each port... wouldnt work...

and B... nobody does it because it doesnt give optimum results

 
well the whole point of me putting the aero was cus of how i want the box.

if i cant put the aero upwards then its not useful for me. id just make the slot port. i cant make a slot port in the middle of the box, which is wehre i want the aero to be.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

robertoyoung08

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
robertoyoung08
Joined
Location
bay area, ca
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
29
Views
2,835
Last reply date
Last reply from
robertoyoung08
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top