A few Mag box questions

klepto
10+ year member

Perveyor of Filth
From what i have read, when porting a Mag you want to run anywhere from 2-2.5 cu^3 ft NET @30-32 hz with anywhere from 30-50sq inches of port. Few questions.

What will the audible difference be from 2-2.5 cu^3 ft. Tighter bass with smaller box? What does it mean "NET" volume? Does that mean you take the total internal ft^3 of the box and subtract the displacement of the sub, in my case .15, and that is your NET displacement?

How does the total SQ in of port effect the sound and behaivor of the driver? Would making a labarenth port be the best way to lengthen it, or would simply making the port wider suffice. Thanks.

Klep

 
this is a mag 12 i'm assuming.

the difference from 2 - 2.25 ft^3 will be fairly minial, but if you compare 2.25 ft^3 then you'll notice the larger box has a more flat response that will extend deeper, whil the smaller box will be more peaked with less low bass.

net volume is internal volume minus driver displacement minus port displacement.

the more power area you have (in^2) the less chance you'll have to hearing port noise. the more port area you have the longer the port will have to be to reacha desired tuning frequency. labyrinth style ports work if that is the only way to fit a long port into a box, but the 180 degree turns can cause air turbulence and increase the chance of port noise. an l-shaped port would be better.

 
this is a mag 12 i'm assuming.
the difference from 2 - 2.25 ft^3 will be fairly minial, but if you compare 2.25 ft^3 then you'll notice the larger box has a more flat response that will extend deeper, whil the smaller box will be more peaked with less low bass.

net volume is internal volume minus driver displacement minus port displacement.

the more power area you have (in^2) the less chance you'll have to hearing port noise. the more port area you have the longer the port will have to be to reacha desired tuning frequency. labyrinth style ports work if that is the only way to fit a long port into a box, but the 180 degree turns can cause air turbulence and increase the chance of port noise. an l-shaped port would be better.
So given the range of 30-50sq in of port, i should try to have as much port area as possible? I chose this design for my sub.... http://img29.imageshack.us/my.php?image=25cubes32hz3125sqin0zp.png

2.5 @32

Am i correct to assume that 2.5 cu^3ft in that mock up does not take into account port area and driver displacement?

How could i make more port are without changing the frequency, making the port wider? Is too wide of a port a bad thing?

 
that box looks good.

moe's plans do take into account port and driver displacement.

making the port wider would require a longer port to get the same tuning, which would in turn make the net volume of the box smaller.

i'd just do that box, or give me the max dimension you can fit, and how wide you want the port to be.

 
I know the 2.5 is the width of the port, but where did you get 12.5 from? Pretty sure i am happy witht his box but would you reccomend more port area to be ideal?

And btw my trunk is 38'' wide x 22'' depth x 19'' height.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

klepto

10+ year member
Perveyor of Filth
Thread starter
klepto
Joined
Location
San Jose, CA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
7
Views
550
Last reply date
Last reply from
xluben
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top