2 OR 4 Channel

[andrewibk 10+ year member]

if i want to power the front stage mids and tweets only?

thank you

Click to read more...

 

[FOSGATE JOE 10+ year member]

well my highs are on a rf 601s amp 2ch 150 watts rms and it sounds grate..are your mids and tweets on diffrent crossoveres??

 

[FOSGATE JOE 10+ year member]

a 4ch will work also

 

[BEAVER.989 10+ year member]

4CH is a better bang for the buck.

Bridge it for more power when running passive... also more fexible, letting you go active later, or power a small sub.

 

[UCF52 10+ year member]

4CH is a better bang for the buck.
Bridge it for more power when running passive... also more fexible, letting you go active later, or power a small sub.

x2. I would get a 4ch and bridge it. Gives you flexibility for later on down the road.

 

[Symon_say 10+ year member]

4CH is a better bang for the buck.
Bridge it for more power when running passive... also more fexible, letting you go active later, or power a small sub.

X3 thats why i have 4ch

 

[2critical 10+ year member]

4CH is a better bang for the buck.
Bridge it for more power when running passive... also more fexible, letting you go active later, or power a small sub.

x4