12" Fi Car Audio Q vs 12" Stereo Integrity Mag D2(Comparo Pics)

[BeesEverywhere! 10+ year member]

ok nub, we've already clarified what i was talking about. i was reffering to fast response time in frequency change u homoerotica square

O RLY, tell me more about that, because thats a load of crap too.

Start with teh word "Qes" and explain....

/me waits...

rofl

hint: it's all in the system design, not the driver

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[Megalomaniac 5,000+ posts]

found it

2nd page http://caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=176594&page=2&highlight=stereo+integrity+mag

The 15 is great as well. May need to move more cone area BUT the 15 is more efficient than the 12. Suspension is tighter in the 12. Hard to beat. You will be more than happy.

 

[Megalomaniac 5,000+ posts]

well when i played somethingon my SX then played something on the mag, i was more impressed with the mag(obviously). but the mag just seem more "faster" at playing notes. and i heard the mags are more effiecient...is this true with the Q?

sorry for the nublet questions

there you go

 

[Megalomaniac 5,000+ posts]

O RLY, tell me more about that, because thats a load of crap too.
Start with teh word "Qes" and explain....

/me waits...

rofl

hint: it's all in the system design, not the driver

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

this is a forum to learn, so dont attack people. Enlighten me please, I am here to learn as well if you have some info that i may not know

 

[BeesEverywhere! 10+ year member]

found it 2nd page http://caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=176594&page=2&highlight=stereo+integrity+mag

Give a 15" the same suspension as a 12" and they compliance of the 15" will be loser because of the larger surround. Its nothing more then that. I doubt the spyderz are different... that’s just silly.. O RLY?

really.

FAKE EDIT: unless they had some problems with coil rock on the 12" frame... i donnnoo...

MAG FTW!

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[Megalomaniac 5,000+ posts]

Give a 15" the same suspension as a 12" and they compliance of the 15" will be loser because of the larger surround. Its nothing more then that. I doubt the spyderz are different... that’s just silly.. O RLY?

really.

FAKE EDIT: unless they had some problems with coil rock on the 12" frame... i donnnoo...

MAG FTW!

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

do you know if the 15" mag is good or not?

edit: i have been thinkin about getting one, but as of now i am plannin on a 15 Q

 

[BeesEverywhere! 10+ year member]

this is a forum to learn, so dont attack people. Enlighten me please, I am here to learn as well if you have some info that i may not know

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

i'll back off, but to answer your question, it really comes down to the box and frequency response. I'm no expert but imo what SQ really depends on is actual driver THD%. which is funny because most people think low excursion cheap drivers with small motor are all about SQ... they ****ing **** at SQ because as soon as you crack em... ooops, they sound like crap and at low volumes you can A/B two speaker all day long and not hear a difference if you design the same Q box for each speaker your subjectively testing. (note the box prolly have to be different) //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

do you know if the 15" mag is good or not?edit: i have been thinkin about getting one, but as of now i am plannin on a 15 Q

I'm sure you can't go wrong with teh mag or Q, but I admit that I don't own either. I hate to say this... but they kinda look and measure the same... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[xluben 10+ year member]

I'm no expert but imo what SQ really depends on is actual driver THD%.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[SirSyko 10+ year member]

I hate to say this... but they kinda look and measure the same... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

So

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif
i'll back off, but to answer your question, it really comes down to the box and frequency response. I'm no expert but imo what SQ really depends on is actual driver THD%. which is funny because most people think low excursion cheap drivers with small motor are all about SQ... they ****ing **** at SQ because as soon as you crack em... ooops, they sound like crap and at low volumes you can A/B two speaker all day long and not hear a difference if you design the same Q box for each speaker your subjectively testing. (note the box prolly have to be different) //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

I'm sure you can't go wrong with teh mag or Q, but I admit that I don't own either. I hate to say this... but they kinda look and measure the same... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

The Rainbow Profi and Vanadium are two good examples of "low excursion, small motor" drivers, though they're not cheap by any means. And they do quite well musically, at low volumes or not //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

And as far as the differences between the Mag and Q, well, they're there //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif Aesthetics mean nothing and specs only take you so far.