Current events discussion

1769385820898.jpeg
 
Last edited:
(b) Unless a sheriff denies a permit under the exception
set forth in subdivision 6, paragraph (a), clause (3), a sheriff
must issue a permit to an applicant if the person:
(1) has training in the safe use of a pistol;
(2) is at least 21 years old and a citizen or a permanent
resident of the United States;
(3) completes an application for a permit;
(4) is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under the
following sections:
(i) 518B.01, subdivision 14;
(ii) 609.224, subdivision 3;
(iii) 609.2242, subdivision 3;
(iv) 609.749, subdivision 8;
(v) 624.713;
(vi) 624.719;
(vii) 629.715, subdivision 2; or
(viii) 629.72, subdivision 2; and
(5) is not listed in the criminal gang investigative data
system under section 299C.091.
(c) A permit to carry a pistol issued or recognized under
this section is a state permit and is effective throughout the

 

1-16.100 - BACKGROUND​

It is the policy of the Department of Justice to value and preserve human life. Officers may use only the force that is objectively reasonable to effectively gain control of an incident, while protecting the safety of the officer and others, in keeping with the standards set forth in Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). Officers may use force only when no reasonably effective, safe, and feasible alternative appears to exist and may use only the level of force that a reasonable officer on the scene would use under the same or similar circumstances.
 
3. CBP policy on the use of force by Authorized Officers/Agents is derived fromconstitutional law, as interpreted by federal courts in cases such as Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) and Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985),federal statutes and applicable DHS and CBP policies.4. Authorized Officers/Agents may use "objectively reasonable" force only when it isnecessary to carry out their law enforcement duties.

 
I am currently permitted to carry in 45 states in the US.

If a known felon tells me he has one or more guns, and threatens my personal safety with even the mention of said guns, I would be within my rights in all of those states to respond with force reasonable to protect my life.

That force would be whatever it takes to disable the person assaulting me.

If someone kicks in my door without a warrant and is armed, Castle Doctrine gives anyone in any state the right to defend their own life with lethal force.
No one is required to retreat out of their own domicile to escape an attacker.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,766
Views
452,873
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
20260423_214720.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
20260419_124349.jpg

BP1Fanatic

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top